Back to announcement
20241104_BMTP_Laporan Hasil Pemeringkatan_31752614_lamp2.pdf
Other Text extracted BMTPSource file signed link, expires in 15 minutes
Extracted text 8
Page 1
RATING ACTION COMMENTARY Fitch Affirms Bank Mantap at 'AA(idn)'; Outlook Stable Wed 23 Oct, 2024 - 5:14 AM ET Fitch Ratings - Jakarta - 23 Oct 2024: Fitch Ratings Indonesia has affirmed PT Bank Mandiri Taspen's (Bank Mantap) National Long-Term Rating at 'AA(idn)'. The Outlook is Stable. Fitch has also affirmed the ratings on the bank's rupiah-denominated senior bonds at 'AA(idn)'. 'AA' National Long-Term Ratings denote expectations of a very low level of default risk relative to other issuers or obligations in the same country or monetary union. The default risk inherent differs only slightly from that of the country's highest rated issuers or obligations. KEY RATING DRIVERS Support-Driven Ratings: Bank Mantap's National Long-Term Rating is driven by Fitch's expectation of extraordinary support from its parent, PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk (Mandiri, BBB/AAA(idn)/Stable/bbb-), which has a controlling 51% stake. State-owned Mandiri is Indonesia's largest bank in terms of total assets. PT Taspen, a state-owned company that manages pension funds for Indonesia's civil servants, holds around 48% of Mantap's shares. Anchored to Parent's Viability Rating: Bank Mantap's rating is linked to its parent's Viability Rating (VR), as we believe extraordinary support would come from Mandiri's internal financial resources. Details on Mandiri's VR and sensitivities can be found in the rating action commentary published on 7 May 2024. Parental Ability to Support: We believe Mandiri's support for its banking subsidiaries will be viewed favourably by the regulator and Bank Mantap's small size relative to its parent, with assets constituting only 2.8% of the group's total at end-1H24, does not constrain Mandiri's ability to provide support. Moderate Support Propensity: Our assessment of parental support propensity remains unchanged, as we view Bank Mantap as a strategically important subsidiary for Mandiri
Page 2
due to its role in servicing the lucrative pension loan business. This loan segment is a sizeable and attractive business for Mandiri because of its high risk-adjusted returns and we expect it to be sustained. RATING SENSITIVITIES Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action/Downgrade A downgrade of Bank Mantap's National Long-Term Rating could arise from a weakening in its overall credit profile relative to the universe of entities rated on our Indonesian National Rating scale. This could happen if we downgrade Mandiri's VR. A perceived decline in the parent's propensity to provide support could also result in negative rating action, which may be caused by a reduction in Mandiri's ownership such that it ceases to be the controlling shareholder; or a significantly diminished role for Bank Mantap in the parent's strategy. Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action/Upgrade An upgrade of Bank Mantap's National Long-Term Rating could arise from a strengthening in its overall credit profile relative to the universe of entities rated on our Indonesian National Rating scale. This could happen if Mandiri's VR is upgraded, or if we believe that Bank Mantap has become more integral and strategically important to Mandiri's overall business. This may be reflected in a substantial increase in Mandiri's ownership of Mantap or a much larger contribution to the parent's earnings. However, we believe these are unlikely to materialise in the near term. OTHER DEBT AND ISSUER RATINGS: KEY RATING DRIVERS Debt Programme: Bank Mantap's debt programme and bonds issued under the programme are rated at the same level as its National Long-Term Rating under Fitch's criteria. This is because the instruments represent direct, senior obligations of the bank and rank equally with all its senior obligations. Indonesia does not have a sophisticated resolution framework, and we believe these obligations have average recovery prospects. OTHER DEBT AND ISSUER RATINGS: RATING SENSITIVITIES Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade: An upgrade in Bank Mantap's National Long-Term Rating would lead to a corresponding upgrade of its issue ratings.
Page 3
Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating
action/downgrade:
Any downgrade of Bank Mantap's National Long-Term Rating would lead to a
corresponding downgrade of its issue ratings.
REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF
RATING
The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable
Criteria.
PUBLIC RATINGS WITH CREDIT LINKAGE TO OTHER RATINGS
Bank Mantap's National Long-Term Rating is credit-linked to Mandiri's VR, based on our
expectation of extraordinary support, if needed.
RATING ACTIONS
ENTITY / DEBT RATING PRIOR
PT Bank Mandiri AA(idn) Rating
Natl LT AA(idn) Rating Outlook Stable
Taspen Outlook
Stable
Affirmed
senior unsecured AA(idn)
Natl LT AA(idn) Affirmed
VIEW ADDITIONAL RATING DETAILS
FITCH RATINGS ANALYSTS
Tisha Mamuaya
Analyst
Primary Rating Analyst
National
+62 21 4000 0544
tisha.mamuaya1@fitchratings.com
PT Fitch Ratings Indonesia
DBS Bank Tower 24th Floor, Suite 2403 Jl. Prof.Dr. Satrio Kav 3-5 Jakarta 12940
Page 4
Jonathan Cornish Managing Director Committee Chairperson +852 2263 9901 jonathan.cornish@fitchratings.com MEDIA CONTACTS Leslie Tan Singapore +65 6796 7234 leslie.tan@thefitchgroup.com Vivian Kam Hong Kong +852 2263 9612 vivian.kam@thefitchgroup.com Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com PARTICIPATION STATUS The rated entity (and/or its agents) or, in the case of structured finance, one or more of the transaction parties participated in the rating process except that the following issuer(s), if any, did not participate in the rating process, or provide additional information, beyond the issuer’s available public disclosure. APPLICABLE CRITERIA National Scale Rating Criteria (pub. 23 Dec 2020) Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 16 Mar 2024) (including rating assumption sensitivity) ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES Solicitation Status Endorsement Policy ENDORSEMENT STATUS PT Bank Mandiri Taspen - DISCLAIMER & DISCLOSURES
Page 5
All Fitch Ratings (Fitch) credit ratings are subject to certain limitations and disclaimers. Please read these limitations and disclaimers by following this link: https://www.fitchratings.com/understandingcreditratings. In addition, the following https://www.fitchratings.com/rating-definitions-document details Fitch's rating definitions for each rating scale and rating categories, including definitions relating to default. ESMA and the FCA are required to publish historical default rates in a central repository in accordance with Articles 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 and The Credit Rating Agencies (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 respectively. Published ratings, criteria, and methodologies are available from this site at all times. Fitch's code of conduct, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, affiliate firewall, compliance, and other relevant policies and procedures are also available from the Code of Conduct section of this site. Directors and shareholders' relevant interests are available at https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory. Fitch may have provided another permissible or ancillary service to the rated entity or its related third parties. Details of permissible or ancillary service(s) for which the lead analyst is based in an ESMA- or FCA-registered Fitch Ratings company (or branch of such a company) can be found on the entity summary page for this issuer on the Fitch Ratings website. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third- party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its
Page 6
reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward- looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. Fitch Ratings makes routine, commonly-accepted adjustments to reported financial data in accordance with the relevant criteria and/or industry standards to provide financial metric consistency for entities in the same sector or asset class. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Fitch also provides information on best-case rating upgrade scenarios and worst-case rating downgrade scenarios (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in each direction) for international credit ratings, based on historical performance. A simple average across asset classes presents best-case upgrades of 4 notches and worst-case downgrades of 8 notches at the 99th percentile. For more details on sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, please see Best- and Worst-Case Measures under the Rating Performance page on Fitch’s website. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for
Page 7
rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the “NRSRO”). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the “non-NRSROs”) and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO. dv01, a Fitch Solutions company, and an affiliate of Fitch Ratings, may from time to time serve as loan data agent on certain structured finance transactions rated by Fitch Ratings. Copyright © 2024 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. READ LESS SOLICITATION STATUS The ratings above were solicited and assigned or maintained by Fitch at the request of the rated entity/issuer or a related third party. Any exceptions follow below. ENDORSEMENT POLICY
Page 8
Fitch’s international credit ratings produced outside the EU or the UK, as the case may be, are endorsed for use by regulated entities within the EU or the UK, respectively, for regulatory purposes, pursuant to the terms of the EU CRA Regulation or the UK Credit Rating Agencies (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, as the case may be. Fitch’s approach to endorsement in the EU and the UK can be found on Fitch’s Regulatory Affairs page on Fitch’s website. The endorsement status of international credit ratings is provided within the entity summary page for each rated entity and in the transaction detail pages for structured finance transactions on the Fitch website. These disclosures are updated on a daily basis.
Names mentioned 12 people and organisations named in the text · linked when the evidence is strong
unresolved
org
Bank Mantap
p.1 ×5
unresolved
org
PT Bank Mandiri Taspen's
p.1
unresolved
org
Bank Mantap's National Long-Term Rating
p.1 ×6
unresolved
org
Bank Mantap's
p.1 ×3
unresolved
org
PT Fitch Ratings Indonesia DBS Bank Tower
p.3
unresolved
org
PT Bank Mandiri Taspen
p.4
unresolved
org
Fitch Australia Pty Ltd
p.7
unresolved
org
Fitch Ratings Ltd.
p.7
Extraction attempts how the parser did, and what it refused
Nothing structured was extracted from this document — the attempts below say why.
No extraction attempted yet.