Back to announcement
20260505_LIFE_Tanggapan atas Permintaan Penjelasan Bursa_32077510_lamp1.pdf
Other Text extracted LIFESource file signed link, expires in 15 minutes
Extracted text 4
Page 1
Jakarta, 5 Mei 2026 /Jakarta, 5 th May 2026
Nomor/Number: 028/MSL-CSEC/V/2026
Kepada Yth/To:
Ibu Mita Dwijayanti
PH Kepala Divisi PP3
PT Bursa Efek Indonesia
Indonesia Stock Exchange Building Tower I lantai 6 Jl. Jend Sudirman Kav. 52 – 53
Jakarta 12910
Perihal: Tanggapan atas Permintaan Penjelasan Bursa
Subject: Response to the IDX Explanation Request
Dengan hormat/Dear Sir/Madam,
Sehubungan dengan surat IDX No. S-05155/BEI.PP3/04-2026 tanggal 30 April 2026 perihal Permintaan Penjelasan
Bursa yang diterima oleh PT MSIG Life Insurance Indonesia Tbk (”Perseroan” atau ”LIFE”), Perseroan bermaksud
untuk menanggapi permintaan Bursa dimaksud.
In connection to the IDX Letter No. S-05155/BEI.PP3/04-2026 dated 30th April 2026 received by the Company regarding
the IDX Explanation Request, PT MSIG Life Insurance Indonesia Tbk (the “Company” or “LIFE”), the Company herewith
respond to such IDX request.
Sebelumnya dapat kami sampaikan bahwa Perseroan telah secara berkala mengungkapkan adanya perkara hukum
dimaksud melalui keterbukaan informasi kepada PT Bursa Efek Indonesia, terakhir melalui surat Perseroan No.
011/MSL-CSEC/II/2026 tanggal 18 Februari 2026 mengenai Tanggapan atas Permintaan Penjelasan Bursa.
The Company has periodically disclosed the existence of the legal case in question through information disclosure to
the Indonesia Stock Exchange, most recently through the Company's letter No. 011/MSL-CSEC/II/2026 dated 18th
February 2026 regarding Response to the IDX Explanation Request.
Terkait permintaan penjelasan Bursa, Perseroan dengan ini menyampaikan tanggapan untuk setiap permintaan
penjelasan tersebut:
Regarding the Exchange's request for clarification, the Company hereby submit o response to each request for
clarification:
1. Pada tanggapan Perseroan pada nomor 011/MSL-CSEC/II/2026 tanggal 18 Februari 2026, Perseroan sedang
melakukan penelaahan secara menyeluruh atas kedua putusan tersebut yaitu 1327 PK/PDT/2025 dan
1407PK/PDT/2025. Dapat disampaikan perkembangan dan hasil dari keputusan Perseroan atas kedua putusan
tersebut
In the Company's response number 011/MSL-CSEC/II/2026 dated February 18, 2026, the Company is conducting
a comprehensive review of the two decisions, namely 1327 PK/PDT/2025 and 1407PK/PDT/2025. The
developments and results of the Company's decisions on the two decisions can be conveyed.
Tanggapan Perseroan:
Sehubungan dengan perkara tersebut, Perseroan dapat menyampaikan bahwa terdapat beberapa proses
hukum yang berjalan dan saling berkaitan. Perseroan memahami bahwa untuk sebagian perkara telah ada
1
Page 2
putusan, namun masih terdapat proses hukum lain terkait pokok permasalahan yang sama yang hingga saat
ini masih dalam penelaahan lebih lanjut oleh Mahkamah Agung.
Perseroan telah menghadiri persidangan sehubungan dengan aanmaning dan telah mengirimkan surat
penundaan pelaksanaan putusan, karena adanya perkara terkait lainnya yang belum selesai diputus. Perseroan
juga secara aktif menangani perkara ini dan akan menempuh langkah sesuai dengan hukum yang berlaku.
In connection with this case, the Company can convey that there are several legal processes that are ongoing and
interrelated. The Company understands that in some cases there has been a decision, but there are still other legal
processes related to the same subject matter that are still under further review by the Supreme Court.
The Company has attended the ongoing hearings regarding aanmaning and has submitted a request to postpone
the enforcement of the decision, given that there are other related cases that have not yet been fully resolved.
The Company is also actively handling this matter and will continue to take the necessary steps in accordance with
applicable regulations.
2. Latar belakang sampai saat ini Perseroan belum memenuhi kewajiban sanksi atas putusan 1327 PK/PDT/2025
dan 1407 PK/PDT/2025 tersebut. Berhubung pada tanggapan Perseroan pada nomor 011/MSL-CSEC/II/2026
tanggal 18 Februari 2026, Perseroan menyampaikan bahwa memiliki kemampuan yang memadai untuk
memenuhi kewajibannya.
The background as to why, to date, the Company has not fulfilled its obligation to comply with the sanctions
under decisions No. 1327 PK/PDT/2025 and 1407 PK/PDT/2025. Considering that, in the Company’s response No.
011/MSL-CSEC/II/2026 dated 18 February 2026, the Company stated that it has sufficient capacity to fulfill its
obligations.
Tanggapan Perseroan:
Tanpa mengurangi penghormatan kami terhadap putusan tersebut, saat ini masih terdapat proses hukum lain
yang berjalan dan saling berkaitan, termasuk upaya hukum yang diajukan oleh pihak lain, yang menurut kami
perlu dicermati terlebih dahulu dalam pelaksanaannya.
Hal ini diperlukan mengingat terdapat permohonan Peninjauan Kembali yang diajukan pihak Tergugat lainnya
yang sampai saat ini belum diputus serta jumlah kewajiban yang dimintakan untuk dieksekusi masih
memerlukan telaah lebih lanjut, karena jumlah tersebut masih harus memperhitungkan pelaksanaan putusan
pidana terhadap mantan tenaga pemasar independen Perseroan (non-karyawan) dan pihak terkait lainnya
Without prejudice to our respect for the decisions, there are currently other ongoing and interrelated legal
proceedings, including legal remedies filed by other parties, which in our view need to be carefully considered prior
to their implementation.
This is necessary as the case has not yet been fully resolved, considering that there is a petition for Judicial review
filed by another Defendant which has not yet been decided, and the amount of obligations to be executed remains
subject to further review, as such amount must still take into account the enforcement of the criminal decision
against the Company’s former independent sales force member (non-employee) and other related parties.
3. Estimasi final Perseroan dalam memenuhi kewajiban sanksi atas putusan 1327 PK/PDT/2025 dan 1407
PK/PDT/2025 tersebut. Mengingat bahwa terdapat Surat Konsultan Hukum Dr. Grubert T. Ughude S.H., M.H.
& Rekan perihal Permohonan Penyitaan Saham Perseroan kepada Pengadilan Negeri Manado dengan nomor
11/GTUIV/2026 pada tanggal 24 April 2026.
The Company’s estimated timeline for the final settlement of its obligation to comply with the sanctions under
decisions No. 1327 PK/PDT/2025 and 1407 PK/PDT/2025, considering that there is a letter from legal counsel Dr.
Grubert T. Ughude, S.H., M.H. & Partners regarding an application for the seizure of the Company’s shares
submitted to the Manado District Court under No. 11/GTU/IV/2026 dated 24 April 2026.
2
Page 3
Tanggapan Perseroan:
Sebagaimana telah Perseroan sampaikan sebelumnya, terdapat beberapa proses hukum yang berjalan dan
saling berkaitan, dan Perseroan pada dasarnya menghormati proses hukum yang berjalan. Estimasi waktu
dapat disampaikan lebih jelas jika permohonan Peninjauan Kembali yang diajukan pihak Tergugat lainnya telah
diputus serta jumlah kewajiban yang dimintakan untuk dieksekusi dalam putusan pidana telah ditetapkan lebih
lanjut
As the Company has previously stated, there are several legal processes that are ongoing and are interrelated, and
the Company basically respects the ongoing legal process and has not been able to convey the details. A clearer
timeline can be provided once the petition for Judicial Review filed by the other Defendant has been decided and
the amount of obligations to be executed under the criminal judgment has been further determined.
4. Informasi, fakta material atau kejadian penting lainnya yang material sehubungan dengan proses keputusan.
Information, material facts, or other significant events that are material in relation to the decision-making process.
Tanggapan Perseroan:
Perseroan telah mengajukan surat penundaan eksekusi ke Pengadilan Negeri Manado pada tanggal 27 Maret
2026. Adapun penundaan eksekusi diperlukan karena perkara belum selesai mengingat terdapat permohonan
Peninjauan Kembali yang diajukan pihak Tergugat lainnya yang sampai saat ini belum diputus. Selain itu, jumlah
kewajiban yang nanti dieksekusi masih memerlukan telaah lebih lanjut, karena jumlah tersebut masih harus
memperhitungkan pelaksanaan putusan pidana terhadap mantan tenaga pemasar independen Perseroan
(non-karyawan) dan pihak terkait lainnya. Sampai dengan saat ini, Perseroan belum memperoleh
pemberitahuan atau konfirmasi resmi mengenai pelaksanaan eksekusi putusan pidana tersebut maupun nilai
yang harus diperhitungkan.
Proses hukum yang sedang berlangsung ini tidak berdampak terhadap kondisi finansial Perseroan. Kondisi
finansial Perseroan tetap sehat dan kuat, tercermin dari RBC yang mencapai 1.380%, jauh di atas ketentuan
minimum regulator 120%, yang menunjukkan kemampuan pembayaran kewajiban kepada nasabah dan
permodalan yang kuat mencapai Rp 7,7 triliun per Desember 2025.
The Company has submitted a letter requesting a postponement of execution to the Manado District Court on 27
March 2026. The postponement is necessary as the case has not yet been fully resolved, considering that there is
a petition for judicial review filed by another Defendant which has not yet been decided. In addition, the amount
of obligations to be executed remains subject to further review, as such amount must still take into account the
enforcement of the criminal decision against the Company’s former independent sales force member (non-
employee) and other related parties. To date, the Company has not received any official notification or
confirmation regarding the enforcement of the criminal decision or the amount to be taken into account in
calculating the Company’s obligations.
The ongoing legal proceedings do not impact Company financial condition. The Company’s financial condition
remains healthy and strong, reflected in our Risk-Based Capital (RBC) ratio of 1,380% — far exceeding the
regulatory minimum of 120% — demonstrating our strong ability to meet obligations to policyholders and robust
capital of Rp 7.7 trillion as of December 2025.
5. Informasi/kejadian penting lainnya yang material dan dapat mempengaruhi kelangsungan hidup perusahaan
serta dapat mempengaruhi kondisi terkini Perseroan.
Other material information/events that may affect the Company’s going concern and may impact the Company’s
current condition.
Tanggapan Perseroan:
Setelah adanya putusan pengadilan dimaksud, Perseroan telah dan akan terus mengambil langkah-langkah
yang diperlukan untuk melindungi kepentingan pemegang saham publik, antara lain dengan melakukan
evaluasi menyeluruh atas putusan tersebut, mempertimbangkan langkah hukum yang tersedia sesuai
3
Page 4
ketentuan yang berlaku, serta memastikan bahwa kegiatan operasional dan kondisi keuangan Perseroan tetap
terjaga. Perseroan juga memastikan kepatuhan terhadap prinsip keterbukaan informasi dan tata kelola
perusahaan yang baik, serta akan menyampaikan informasi lanjutan kepada publik apabila terdapat
perkembangan material sesuai dengan ketentuan pasar modal yang berlaku.
Perseroan juga memastikan bahwa seluruh kegiatan operasional berjalan normal, serta tetap berkomitmen
penuh melayani para pemangku kepentingan.
Following the court ruling, the Company has taken and will continue to take the necessary steps to protect the
interests of public shareholders, including conducting a thorough evaluation of the ruling, considering available
legal measures in accordance with applicable regulations, and ensuring that the Company's operational activities
and financial condition remain secure. The Company also ensures compliance with the principles of information
transparency and good corporate governance and will provide further information to the public if there are
material developments in accordance with applicable capital market regulations.
The Company confirms that all operational continue as normal, and the Company remains fully committed to
serving our stakeholders.
Demikian informasi ini kami sampaikan. Atas perhatiannya kami ucapkan terima kasih.
Thus, we conveyed. Thank you for your attention.
Hormat kami,
Sincerely,
PT MSIG Life Insurance Indonesia Tbk
Tomoyuki Monden
Deputy President Director
4
Names mentioned 13 people and organisations named in the text · linked when the evidence is strong
unresolved
person
Mita Dwijayanti PH Kepala Divisi PP
p.1
unresolved
org
PT Bursa Efek Indonesia Indonesia Stock Exchange Building
p.1
unresolved
org
Indonesia Stock Exchange
p.1 ×2
unresolved
org
Life Insurance Indonesia Tbk
p.1 ×3
unresolved
org
Mahkamah Agung
p.2
unresolved
person
Konsultan Hukum Dr. Grubert T. Ughude S.H.
p.2 ×4
unresolved
org
M.H. & Rekan
p.2
unresolved
org
Pengadilan Negeri Manado
p.2 ×2
unresolved
org
M.H. & Partners
p.2
unresolved
org
Manado District Court
p.2 ×2
Extraction attempts how the parser did, and what it refused
Nothing structured was extracted from this document — the attempts below say why.
No extraction attempted yet.