Skip to content
Back to announcement

20250514_BMAS_Tanggapan atas Permintaan Penjelasan Bursa_31885591_lamp1.pdf

Other Text extracted BMAS

Source file signed link, expires in 15 minutes

This browser can't display the PDF inline. Open it in a new tab.

Extracted text 2

Page 1 OCR 0.919
RE BANK MASPION

Nomor

:XXXVI/296/AA/SBY/05/2025

Lampiran / Attachment — : -

Perihal / Subject

Kepada Yth.

PT Bursa Efek Indonesia / Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI)
Gedung Bursa Efek Indonesia

Jl. Jend Sudirman Kav 52 — 53

Jakarta 12190

Surabaya, 14 Mei 2025

: Permintaan Penjelasan Bursa / Reguest for Clarification

U.p. Kepala Divisi Penilaian Perusahaan 1 / Head of Company Valuation Division 1

Head Office :

Dengan Hormat,

Menanggapi surat elektronik 5-04537/BEI.PP1/05-
2025 yang kami terima dari Bursa Efek Indonesia
pada tanggal 9 Mei 2025, perihal Permintaan
Penjelasan Bursa, tentang gugatan oleh PT Alim
Investindo terhadap Perseroan dengan nomor
perkara 1349/Pdt.G/2023/PN Sby. Bersama ini kami
untuk dan atas nama PT Bank Maspion Indonesia
Tbk akan menyampaikan jawaban atas pertanyaan
tersebut sebagaimana terlampir,

1. Klarifikasi
tersebut

atas kebenaran informasi

Jawaban:

Bahwa Benar terkait dengan adanya Gugatan
yang diajukan PTAI kepada PT. Bank Maspion
Indonesia Tbk dengan nomor Gugatan
1349/Pdt.G/2023/PN Sby.

2 Latar belakang gugatan tersebut terjadi

Jawaban:

PT Alim Investindo (Penggugat), menggugat
pelaksanaan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar
Biasa (RUPS LB) yang dilaksanakan PT Bank
Maspion Indonesia, Tbk (Perseroan) pada tanggal
15 Juni 2023 yang dinyatakan tidak sesuai dengan
ketentuan hukum yang berlaku.

3. Status perkara hukum tersebut saat ini.

Jawaban:
Status perkara Hukum sampai bulan Mei masih
berjalan di Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya dengan
Agenda Saksi dan Saksi Ahli dari Pihak Penggugat.

Dear Sir/Madam,

In response to the electronic letter S-
04537/BEI.PP1/05-2025, which we received from
the Indonesia Stock Exchange on May 9, 2025,
regarding the Reguest for Clarification from the
Exchange about the lawsuit filed by PT Alim
Investindo against the Company, with case number
1349/Pdt.G/2023/PN Sby, we, on behalf of PT Bank
Maspion Indonesia Tbk, hereby provide our
response to the guestions as attached:

1. Clarification regarding the accuracy of the
information.

Response:

It is true that there is a lawsuit filed by PT Alim
Investindo (the Plaintiff) against PT Bank Maspion
Indonesia — Tbk, — with case number
1349/Pdt.G/2023/PN Sby.

2. The background of the lawsuit.

Response:
PT Alim Investindo (the Plaintiff) filed d lawsuit
regarding the Extraordinary General Meeting of
Shareholders (EGM) held by PT Bank Maspion
Indonesia Tbk (the Company) on June 15, 2023,
which was claimed to be in violation of applicable
legal provisions.

3, The current status of the legal case.

Response:

As of May, the legal case is still ongoing at the
Surabaya District Court, with the agenda of
witness testimony and expert witnesses from the
Plaintiff's side.

Hart y

Pakuwon Tower, Tunjungan Plaza 8 It. 32 & 33, Jl. Embong Malang No. 21-31, Surabaya, Indonesia
Phone : 462 31 985 88789 | Email : sekt dirut@bankmaspion.co.id

www.bankmaspion.co.id
Page 2 OCR 0.911
EF) BANK MASPION

4. Apakah nilai sengketa yang mendasari
gugatan tersebut berdampak material terhadap
kelangsungan usaha dan aktivitas operasional
Perseroan? Mohon jelaskan.

Jawaban :

Perkara Hukum tersebut tidak secara Material
dapat mempengaruhi keadaan keuangan, harta
kekayaan dan kelangsungan usaha Bank.

5. Hal/upaya/rencana yang akan dilakukan
Perseroan sehubungan dengan penyelesaian
perkara hukum tersebut

Jawaban :

Perseroan akan membuktikan di Pengadilan
dengan Bukti Surat dan atau dokumen serta Saksi-
saksi yang ada bahwa RUPS yang dilaksanakan
tanggal 15 Juni 2023 tersebut SAH dan sudah
sesuai dengan peraturan serta perundang-
undangan yang berlaku

6. Alasan tidak disampaikan keterbukaan
informasi mengingat sidang pertama sudah
dilakukan pada tanggal 18 Februari 2025

Jawaban :
Information tersebut telah diungkapkan dalam
Laporan Keuangan Audited Bank

Demikian tanggapan ini kami sampaikan, atas
perhatian yang diberikan kami sampaikan terima
kasih.

Hormat kami / Sincerely,

PT Bank Maspion Indonesia Tbk

« MASPION INDOMESS
2

9
2 AN
#OCKANTOR PUSAT ) , :

4. Whether the value of the dispute in the lawsuit
has a material impact on the Company's business
continuity and operational activities? Please
explain.

Response:

This legal matter does not materially affect the
financial condition, assets, or the business
continuity of the Bank.

5. The actions/plans the Company intends to take
regarding the resolution of the legal case.

Response:

The Company will present evidence in court,
including documents and available witnesses, to
prove that the EGM held on June 15, 2023, was
valid and in full compliance with the relevant laws
and regulations.

6. The reason why the disclosure of this
information was not made, given that the first
hearing was held on February 18, 2025.

Response:
The information has been disclosed in the Bank's
Audited Financial Statements.

This concludes our response. We thank you for your
attention and consideration.

N 8 »
ST T
Kasemsri Charoensiddhi BA BR

Direktur Utama & PJS Direktur Kredit /

Viktor Ebenheizer Fanggidae

Direktur Kepatuhan dan Legal /

President Director & Acting Director of Credit Compliance and Legal Director

Head Office :
Pakuwon Tower, Tunjungan Plaza 6 It. 32 & 33, Jl. Embong Malang No. 21-31, Surabaya, Indonesia

Phone : 462 31 985 88789 | Email : sekt dirut@bankmaspion.co.id www.bankmaspion.co.id

File

File Open PDF
Source IDX
Size0.77 MB
Published14 May 2025
Pages2
Characters5,318
Text sourceOCR
OCR confidence0.915

Names mentioned 8 people and organisations named in the text · linked when the evidence is strong

linked org Bank Maspion Indonesia Tbk p.1 ×18
linked person Kasemsri Charoensiddhi p.2
linked person Viktor Ebenheizer Fanggidae p.2
possible org PT Bursa Efek Indonesia p.1 ×3
possible org PT Alim Investindo p.1 ×9
unresolved org Indonesia Stock Exchange p.1 ×2
unresolved org Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya p.1
unresolved org Surabaya District Court p.1

Extraction attempts how the parser did, and what it refused

Nothing structured was extracted from this document — the attempts below say why.

No extraction attempted yet.

↑↓ select ↵ open ⇧↵ see every result