Source file signed link, expires in 15 minutes
Extracted text 48
Page 1
Page 2
Contents
1. General Information ....................................................................................................... 1
2. Reviewer Team ............................................................................................................... 1
3. Listed Company Profile .................................................................................................. 2
4. Assessment Procedure .................................................................................................. 2
5. Assessment Analysis ...................................................................................................... 4
5.1. Mapping of Company’s Subsidiary....................................................................... 5
5.2. Taxonomic Assessment of the Company’s, Subsidiaries and Activities ................. 5
5.3. Financial/Financial Assessment .......................................................................... 7
5.4. Summary of Holding Company Level Assessment Results.................................... 8
6. Opinion ........................................................................................................................ 10
7. Appendix...................................................................................................................... 11
Appendix 1: List of Supporting Documents for the Assessment .......................................... 11
Appendix 2: TKBI-Alignment Assessment per Business Activity .......................................... 12
1. Pakkat Hydropower Plant .................................................................................. 12
2. Air Putih Hydropower Plant ............................................................................... 14
3. Madong Mini Hydropower Plant ......................................................................... 16
4. Ordi Hulu Mini Hydropower Plant ...................................................................... 18
5. Salu Noling Mini Hydropower Plant .................................................................... 20
ii
Page 3
1. General Information
Report Publication Date : 18th August 2026
Report Revision Number : 0
Report Status : ☒ Final ☐ Draft ☐ Revisi
Company Name : PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk (KEEN)
Name of the Responsible : Giat Widjaja
Director
Email Address : corporate.secretary@kencanaenergy.com
Phone Number : 021-58900791
Head Office Address : Kencana Tower, 11th Floor, Business Park, Kebon Jeruk, Jl.
Meruya Ilir Raya No. 88 West Jakarta 11620
Assessment Documents : Registration and Application Document for Green Equity
Designation 2025
Assessment Objectives : Conducted an external review with outputs of an evaluation
report and an independent opinion on the Registration
Document and Green Equity Application Documents for
Green Equity Designation of PT Kencana Energi Lestari, Tbk
(KEEN) for the 2025 reporting period.
Scope The scope of the assessment is as follows:
• The Business Sector is the Energy Sector, the Power
Plant subsector (KBLI: 35101); (KBLI 2020: 35111);
(KBLI 2025: 35120).
• Portfolio Level assessment limitations include:
1. PT Energi Sakti Sentosa (ESS) which operates the
Pakkat hydropower plant
2. PT Bangun Tirta Lestari (BTL) which operates the
Air Putih hydropower plant
3. PT Nagata Dinamika Hidro Madong (NDHM) which
operates the Madong mini hydropower plant
4. PT Sumatra Energi Lestari (SEL) which operates
the Ordi Hulu mini hydropower plant
5. PT Tiara Tirta Energi (TTE) which operates the Salu
Noling mini hydropower plant
Guarantee Level : Limited
Assessment period 1 January – 31 December 2025
2. Reviewer Team
Name of External Review : PT Superintending Company of Indonesia (SUCOFINDO)
Provider (Persero)
Address of External Review : Graha Sucofindo, Street. Raya Pasar Minggu No.Kav. 34,
Provider RT.4/RW.1, Pancoran, Pancoran District, South Jakarta
City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta 12780
Independent Reviewer : Dikman Purnama
External Review Team : Lead: Putri Rafika Dewi
Member 1: Galuh Chynintya R.P.
Member 2: Reza Mochammad Fadhlur Rahman
Member 3: Diah Nur Oktavia
External Review Reference : 1. Indonesian Sustainable Finance Taxonomy (TKBI)
2. WFE Green Equity Principles
1
Page 4
Summary of Assessment : ☒ Green
Conclusions ☐ Transition
☐ Not Compliant
PT SUCOFINDO as the External Review Provider has
conducted a Portfolio Level Assessment of the
Registration Letter Document and Green Equity
Application Documents for Green Equity Designation
submitted by PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk for the 2025
reporting period. Based on evaluation review, there is
nothing of concern to us that leads us to believe that the
statement of Green Equity contains material
misrepresentations. We conclude that PT Kencana Energi
Lestari Tbk's claim regarding the classification of Green
Equity for the 2025 reporting period has met the criteria
required for Green Equity Designation, in all material
respects.
3. Listed Company Profile
PT Kencana Energi Lestari, Tbk. (KEEN) is a company engaged in the development and provision
of new and renewable energy based on electricity (new and renewable energy developer) that
operates as an Independent Power Producer (IPP) in Indonesia. The Company focuses on the
development, construction, operation, and maintenance of new and renewable energy (NRE)-
based power generation systems, especially Hydroelectric Power Plants as well as several other
clean energy initiatives such as biomass and solar power.
PT Kencana Energi Lestari was established in 2008 as part of the business expansion of Kencana
Group, a national business group that has a business portfolio in the construction, energy, and
infrastructure sectors. Since its inception, the Company has been committed to providing clean,
sustainable, and reliable energy to meet the increasing national electricity needs, as well as
support the providing of the energy transition in Indonesia. In carrying out its business model, the
Company develops power generation projects through the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)
scheme with PT PLN (Persero) as an electricity off-taker. Along with its business development,
the Company continues to strengthen its renewable energy generation portfolio and prioritize
responsible natural resource management and the application of sustainability principles. In
2019, the Company conducted an Initial Public Offering (IPO) and officially listed its shares on
the Indonesia Stock Exchange with the Green Equity code KEEN, as part of efforts to strengthen
funding capacity and support business development in the renewable energy sector.
Currently, the Company has been active in the development of various renewable energy
projects, including Hydroelectric Power Plant (PLTA), Biomass Power Plant (PLTBm), and Solar
Power Plant (PLTS), some of which are operating and some still in the development stage.
4. Assessment Procedure
The procedure for assessing the alignment of the Holding Company's portfolio refers to Appendix
13 of TKBI Version 3 concerning the Assessment of TKBI at the Portfolio Level (Figure 1).
2
Page 5
Figure 1. TKBI assessment at the Portfolio level
The assessment is conducted step by step. The process begins by mapping each company’s
subsidiary and investment within the scope of the portfolio, assessing the economic activities of
each company individually, and then combining all the assessment results to obtain a TKBI
alignment profile at the Holding Company level. This approach is important because the level of
alignment of a portfolio cannot be directly determined based solely on the type of business or
company name. Each company’s subsidiary has several activities with different levels of
alignment, so all activities need to be reviewed first before the results are consolidated.
The initial stage is carried out through an inventory / mapping of all subsidiary companies,
investments, and economic activities that are within the scope of the assessment. The
information collected at least includes the name of the subsidiary/investment company, the
name and description of the business activity, as well as the Indonesian Standard Industrial
Classification (KBLI) code and description. The data needs to be compiled completely and
consistently so that each activity can be traced and associated with the company that runs it.
This mapping is also the basis for determining whether an activity has been included in the scope
of TKBI or has TKBI-eligible status. Activities that are not yet covered in the TKBI sector or activity
list are still recorded but are treated as TKBI-non-eligible or out of scope.
Activities that are included in the scope of TKBI are then assessed for their level of alignment or
TKBI-alignment at the activity level. The assessment is carried out using Technical Screening
Criteria (TSC) which are in accordance with the sector and characteristics of the activity. This
stage begins with an assessment of whether the activity makes a contribution that meets the
criteria for the selected main Environmental Objective (EO). Furthermore, the assessment of the
Essential Criteria (EC) of each activity to ensure that the business activity does not cause
significant damage to other aspects. The EC assessment consists of the Do No Significant Harm
(DNSH) assessment, Remedial Measures to Transition (RMT) and the fulfillment of social aspects.
Based on the results of the assessment, each activity is grouped into the categories of Green,
Transition, Not Classified, or TKBI-non-eligible. The Green category is given to activities that meet
the Green Criteria in TKBI, while the Transition category is given to activities that meet the
transition criteria that have been set. Activities that fall under the scope of TKBI but do not meet
the Green or Transition criteria are recorded as Not Meeting the Classification. Meanwhile,
activities that do not have the scope or assessment criteria in TKBI are recorded as TKBI-non-
eligible.
3
Page 6
If a company’s subsidiary runs more than one economic activity, the results of each activity
assessment are first aggregated to obtain an alignment profile at the entity level. Aggregation can
use Revenue, Capital Expenditure, or Operating Expenditure indicators, according to business
characteristics, activity development stages, and assessment objectives. Each company’s
subsidiary will then have a percentage profile showing the portion of Green, Transition, Not-
Classified, and TKBI-non-eligible activities. The profile is then used as the basis for assessment
at the Holding Company level. In the portfolio aggregation process, the contribution of each
company’s subsidiary is weighted based on its proportion to the Holding Company's total
Revenue, CapEx, or OpEx. The percentage in each category at the company’s subsidiary level is
multiplied by the weight of the company's contribution, then added to the results of other
subsidiaries. In this way, a company’s subsidiary with a greater financial contribution will have a
greater influence on the outcome of the portfolio valuation.
The results of the Holding Company's assessment are presented in the form of a portfolio
percentage profile, rather than as a single classification. The profile shows the large part of the
portfolio which includes the categories Green, Transition, Not Compliant with Classification, and
TKBI-non-eligible or out of scope. This approach provides a more complete picture of the
condition of the portfolio because it can show activities that have been aligned, activities that are
still in the transition process, activities that have not met the requirements, and activities that
have not been covered by TKBI. The results can also be used to assess the development of the
portfolio over time and see changes in the direction of the Holding Company.
5. Assessment Analysis
This section presents the results of the assessment of the alignment of PT Kencana Energi Lestari
Tbk's (KEEN) portfolio with the Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance Indonesia (TKBI) Version 3.
Given the Company's organizational structure as a holding company with various subsidiaries in
the power generation sector, the assessment was conducted using the Holding Company's
Portfolio Level approach. In line with the TKBI framework, the evaluation is carried out in stages:
alignment is first identified at the Activity level using Technical Screening Criteria (TSC), which is
then aggregated into an Entity-level alignment assessment for each subsidiary, before finally
being consolidated cumulatively at the Group Portfolio level.
Revenue is defined as the main aggregation approach in this assessment. The selection of this
metric is based on the operational condition of the subsidiary, the majority of which have been in
the commercial operating stage, so that the income from electricity sales is the most appropriate
measure to show how big the Holding Company's business is in accordance with the TKBI green
classification.
This assessment covers the period of 2025 by utilizing segmented financial data, licensing
documents, operational reports, and environmental and social performance data from each
subsidiary. All financial figures used refer to data in audited financial statements. Therefore, this
assessment focuses on taxonomic alignment and does not include audit procedures for such
financial statements.
4
Page 7
5.1. Mapping of Company’s Subsidiary
The initial step of assessment was carried out by mapping the Holding company's portfolio into
an individual list of subsidiaries' investments. Based on the Application Letter for Green Equity
Designation submitted by PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk in 2025 to IDX, it is known that the
Company runs a power generation business sourced from new and renewable energy (NRE)
through its subsidiaries.
Until the 2025 reporting period, PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk has developed the Hydroelectric
Power Plant (PLTA) and Minihydro Power Plant (PLTM) projects. The mapping results of the
subsidiary of PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk are presented in Table 3.1.
Table 3. 1. Mapping of Company’s subsidiary of PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk.
Date of
Company’s Business Commercial Ownership
Num. Location
subsidiary Activities Operation Percentage
(COD)
Humbang
Pakkat
PT Energy Sakti Sentosa Kasundutan
1 Hydropower 31 January 2018 75,00%
("ESS") Regency, North
Plant
Sumatra
PT Bangun Tirta Lestari Air Putih Lebong Regency,
2 22 January 2020 98,40%
("BTL") Hydropower Bengkulu
Madong mini North Toraja
PT Nagata Dinamika
3 hydropower Regency, South March 25, 2022 74,42%
Hidro Madong ("NDHM")
plant Sulawesi
Ordi Hulu mini Pakpak Bharat
PT Sumatra Energi
4 hydropower Regency, North March 31, 2024 90,00%
Lestari ("SEL")
plant Sumatra
Salu Noling
PT Tiara Tirta Energi mini Luwu Regency, Not yet
5 75,00%
("TTE") hydropower South Sulawesi operational
plant
5.2. Taxonomic Assessment of the Company’s, Subsidiaries and Activities
It is important to understand that not all economic activities listed in the Indonesian Business
Field Standard Classification (KBLI) fall within the scope of the Taxonomy for Indonesia's
Sustainable Finance (TKBI). This taxonomy only includes activities that are considered to make a
substantial contribution to economic, environmental, or social goals, which are then categorized
as TKBI-eligible activities.
In this assessment process, the operations of each company’s subsidiary are described into
individual economic activities based on the KBLI code to identify their eligibility status. The
identified activities included in the scope of the taxonomy are then analyzed in more depth based
on the fulfillment of the main Environmental Objective (EO) and the Essential Criteria (EC). The
analysis of these Essential Criteria includes the assessment of Do No Significant Harm (DNSH)
and the fulfillment of the Social Aspect (SA).
5
Page 8
The following table presents the results of TKBI eligibility assessment of economic activities
carried out by the PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk business group based on the technical
provisions in TKBI.
Table 3. 2. TKBI-Eligibility Assessment of the Economic Activities of PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk
Company’s
Business TKBI Business Scale and
subsidiary KBLI
Activities Eligibility Assessment Method
Name
PT Energi Sakti Pakkat KBLI 35101 (2017) / KBLI 35111 TKBI- Corporation -
Sentosa (ESS) Hydropower (2020) - Electricity Generation Eligible Technical Screening
Plant or Criteria (TSC)
KBLI 35120 (2025) - Electricity
Generation from Renewable
Energy Sources.
PT Bangun Tirta Air Putih KBLI 35101 (2017) / KBLI 35111 TKBI- Corporation -
Lestari (BTL) hydropower (2020) - Electricity Generation Eligible Technical Screening
plant or Criteria (TSC)
KBLI 35120 (2025) - Electricity
Generation from Renewable
Energy Sources.
PT Nagata Madong mini KBLI 35101 (2017) / KBLI 35111 TKBI- Corporation -
Dinamika Hidro hydropower plant (2020) - Electricity Generation Eligible Technical Screening
Madong or Criteria (TSC)
(NDHM) KBLI 35120 (2025) - Electricity
Generation from Renewable
Energy Sources.
PT Sumter Ordi Hulu mini KBLI 35101 (2017) / KBLI 35111 TKBI- Corporation -
Energi Lestari hydropower plant (2020) - Electricity Generation Eligible Technical Screening
(SEL) or Criteria (TSC)
KBLI 35120 (2025) - Electricity
Generation from Renewable
Energy Sources.
PT Tirta Tiara Salu Noling mini KBLI 35101 (2017) / KBLI 35111 TKBI- Corporation -
Energi (TTE) hydropower plant (2020) - Electricity Generation Eligible Technical Screening
or Criteria (TSC)
KBLI 35120 (2025) - Electricity
Generation from Renewable
Energy Sources.
Based on the results of the TKBI eligibility assessment, all economic activities owned by PT
Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk can be categorized as TKBI-Eligible, as shown in Table 3.2. Thus, the
activity level assessment process can be continued to the next stage, namely assessing whether
each activity meets the TKBI classification requirements: Green, Transition, or Does Not Meet the
Classification. Table 3.3 shows the conclusion of the TKBI-alignment assessment results for
each business activity of PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk (KEEN). In detail, the TKBI-alignment
assessment is presented in Appendix 2.
Table 3. 3. Summary of TKBI-Alignment Assessment of Economic Activities of PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk
Taxonomic Assessment (TKBI - Alignment)
Company
Num. Subsidiaries Social
Activities EO EC Classification
Aspects
Pakkat EO1 Climate Social
PT Energy Sakti
1 hydropower Change DNSH: meet Aspect: Green
Sentosa ("ESS")
plant Mitigation meet
6
Page 9
Air Putih EO1 Climate Social
PT Bangun Tirta
2 hydropower Change DNSH: meet Aspect: Green
Lestari ("BTL")
plant Mitigation meet
Salu Noling
EO1 Climate Social
PT Tiara Tirta mini
3 Change DNSH: meet Aspect: Green
Energi ("TTE") hydropower
Mitigation meet
plant
PT Sumatra Ordi Hulu mini EO1 Climate Social
4 Energi Lestari hydropower Change DNSH: meet Aspect: Green
("SEL") plant Mitigation meet
PT Nagata
Madong mini EO1 Climate Social
Dinamika Hidro
5 hydropower Change DNSH: meet Aspect: Green
Madong
plant Mitigation meet
("NDHM")
5.3. Financial/Financial Assessment
Financial/financial valuation refers to the WFE Green Equity Principles standard which has the
following criteria:
Green Equity 1) Revenue Stage: >50% of total annual revenue is classified as green, or
Designation 2) Pre-Revenue Stage: >50% of investment (Opex or Capex) contributes
to the green economy
Green Equity 1) Revenue Stage: >50% of total annual revenue is classified as green, or
Transition 2) Pre-Revenue Stage: >50% of investment (Opex or Capex) is allocated
Designation to activities classified as green or transitional.
The assessment is carried out based on the Financial Statements of PT Kencana Energi Lestari
Tbk for 2025. The business activities of the Company’s subsidiary are entirely at the revenue
stage so that the assessment uses the Revenue indicator of green activities. The following are
the details of the financial assessment:
Table 3.4 Financial Valuation of PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk
Portfolio-Level Green Finance Assessment
E=
C=
Compa Taxono A B D (D/W) x F=CxE
(W/A) x 100%
Nu ny’s Company mic 100%
m. subsidi Activities Assess % Green
Holding Total Revenue Green % Green
ary ment % of Revenue Income
Company of Subsidiary Revenue Revenue of
of Company’s Aggregation
Revenue Companies Subsidiary Subsidiary
subsidiary per
(USD) (USD) (USD) Companies
Subsidiary
Pakkat
1 PT ESS hydropower Green 5.690.867 16,58% 5.690.867 100,00% 16,58%
plant
Air Putih
2 PT BTL hydropower Green 9.201.621 26,80% 9.201.621 100,00% 26,80%
plant
Salu Noling mini
3 PT TTE hydropower Green 34.333.492 10.530.605 30,67% 10.530.605 100,00% 30,67%
plant
Ordi Hulu mini
4 PT SEL hydropower Green 4.002.027 11,66% 4.002.027 100,00% 11,66%
plant
Madong mini
PT
5 hydropower Green 4.870.242 14,19% 4.870.242 100,00% 14,19%
NDHM
plant
7
Page 10
% of Portfolio Green Income 99,89%
Classification GREEN
*Revenue data source: Financial Statements of PT Kencana Energi Lesteri Tbk Year 2025
Based on Table 3.4, PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk has a portfolio-level green income of 99.89%
in the 2025 period. Therefore, PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk has met the Green criteria and is
classified as GREEN.
5.4. Summary of Portfolio Level Assessment Results
Organization Name : PT Kencana Energi Lestari, Tbk
Registered Company Code : KEEN
Sector / Subsector : Energy / Power Generation (KBLI 2025: 35120)
Program/Mechanism : IDX Green Equity Designation
Reference Standards : 1. Indonesian Sustainable Finance Taxonomy (TBKI)
2. WFE Green Equity Principles
Scope : Portfolio Level - Holding Company
Assessment Period : 1 January 2025 – December 2025
8
Page 11
Financial/Financial
Taxonomic Assessment (TKBI - Alignment)
Assessment
Company’s Company Activity Code / Sector / % of
Yes % Green
subsidiary Activities KBLI Subsector Social Portfolio
EO EC Klasifikasi Income
Aspects Green
Aggregation
Income
KBLI 35101 EO1 Climate DNSH: Social
PT Energy Sakti Pakkat Energy,
[2017]/KBLI 35111 Change meet Aspect: meet
1 Sentosa Hydropower Power Green 16,58%
[2020]/KBLI 35120 Mitigation
("ESS") Plant Generation
[2025]/
KBLI 35101 Energy, EO1 Climate DNSH: Social
PT Bangun
Water [2017]/KBLI 35111 Power Change meet Aspect: meet
2 Tirta Lestari Green 26,80%
Hydropower [2020]/KBLI 35120 Generation Mitigation
("BTL")
[2025]/
KBLI 35101 Energy, EO1 Climate DNSH: Social
PT Tiara Tirta PLTM Salu [2017]/KBLI 35111 Power Change meet Aspect: meet
3 Green 30,67% 99,89%
Energi ("TTE") Noling [2020]/KBLI 35120 Generation Mitigation
[2025]/
KBLI 35101 Energy, EO1 Climate DNSH: Social
PT Sumatra
PLTM Ordi [2017]/KBLI 35111 Power Change meet Aspect: meet
4 Energi Lestari Green 11,66%
Hulu [2020]/KBLI 35120 Generation Mitigation
("SEL")
[2025]/
PT Nagata KBLI 35101 Energy, EO1 Climate DNSH: Social
Dinamika PLTM [2017]/KBLI 35111 Power Change meet Aspect: meet
5 Green 14,19%
Hidro Madong Madong [2020]/KBLI 35120 Generation Mitigation
("NDHM") [2025]/
Based on the "TKBI-aligned" assessment, the Conglomerate of the Holding Company of PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk (KEEN) has a "Green”
classification portion of 99.89%.
9
Page 12
6. Opinion
The assessment report and opinion statement on the Registration Letter and Application for
Green Equity Designation of PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk (KEEN) for the 2025 period, are the full
responsibility of the External Review Provider, PT SUCOFINDO. Meanwhile, the applicant entity,
PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk, is responsible for the presentation of claims, statements, and
information in the Registration Letter Document and Application for Green Equity Designation.
The assessment process is carried out by PT SUCOFINDO through two schemes, namely (1)
Taxonomic Assessment which refers to TKBI Version 3, using the Portfolio Level assessment of
the Technical Screening Criteria (TSC) method; and (2) Financial Assessment which refers to the
WFE Green Equity Principles. The data examined is historical, including the 2025 Green Equity
Designation Registration Letter and Application, the 2025 Financial and Sustainability
Statements, and other supporting documents in the form of technical documents and permits.
Based on the external review performed by PT SUCOFINDO, nothing has come to our attention
that causes us to believe that the Green Equity Statement contains any material misstatement.
Accordingly, we conclude that PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk,s Green Equity classification for the
2025 reporting period meets the eligibility criteria for Green Equity Designation, in all material
respects.
The entire assessment process has been carried out independently and free from conflicts of
interest, including personal, financial, and other relationships that may affect the objectivity of
the assessment. This Opinion statement is true, accurate, and complete.
Jakarta, 18th August 2026
Putri Rafika Dewi Dikman Purnama
External Review Lead Independent Reviewer
10
Page 13
7. Appendix
Appendix 1: List of Supporting Documents for the Assessment
1. Financial Report of PT Kencana Energi Lestari in 2025
2. PT Kencana Energi Lestari Sustainability Report in 2025
3. Determination of the Policy of Respect and Protection of Human Rights Based on
International Standards (Decree of the Board of Directors No.57/SK-DIR/LEG-
KEL/XII/2024)
4. Technical Documents and Licensing per Company’s subsidiary and Activity
Company’s Business
Technical Documents and Permits
subsidiary Activities
PT Energi Sakti Pakkat 1. ESS - IUPTL PLTA Decks
Sentosa Hydropower 2. ESS - Pakkat Hydropower Environmental Permit
("ESS") Plant 3. ESS - DELH PLTA Decks
4. ESS - Environmental Permit Report Semester 1 2025
5. ESS - Environmental Permit Report Semester 2 2025
6. Application Letter No. 026/ESS-Leg/VII/2026 dated July 15, 2026
PT Bangun Tirta Air Putih 1. BTL - IUPTL HYDROPOWER PLANT
Lestari ("BTL") Hydropower 2. BTL - Air Putih Hydropower Environmental Permit
Plant 3. BTL - UKL UPL Hydropower Plant
4. BTL - SIPPA Hydropower Plant
5. BTL - Environmental Permit Report Semester 1 2025
6. BTL - Environmental Permit Report Semester 2 2025
7. BTL - Environmental Monitoring Minutes
8. BTL - E-Jounal University of Bengkulu
PT Nagata Madong 1. NDHM - Power Plant Business License (IUPTL) PLTM Madong
Dinamika Hidro Mini 2. NDHM - Environmental Evaluation Document (DELH) of PLTM
Madong Hydropower Madong
("NDHM") Plant 3. NDHM - Environmental Permit of PLTM Madong
4. NDHM - Environmental Permit Report of RKL RPL SMT I 2025 PLTM
Madong
5. NDHM - Environmental Permit Report RKL RPL SMT II 2025 PLTM
Madong
6. NDHM – Natural Resources Management Permit (PSDA)
PT Sumatra Ordi Hulu 1. SEL - Power Plant Business License (IUPTL) PLTM Ordi Hulu
Energi Lestari Mini 2. SEL - Environmental Permit for PLTM Ordi Hulu
("SEL") Hydropower 2. SEL - Environmental Permit Report for Semester I 2025
Plant 3. SEL - Environmental Permit Report Semester II 2025
4. SEL - Natural Resources Management Permit (PSDA)
PT Tiara Tirta Salu Noling 1. TTE - Power Plant Business Permit (IUPTL) PLTM Salu Noling
Energi ("TTE") Mini 2. TTE - UKL UPL PLTM Salu Noling
Hydropower 3. TTE - Environmental Permit for PLTM Salu Noling
Plant 4. TTE - Report on the Implementation of RKL-RPL for the Construction
Stage of the First Semester of 2025
5. TTE - Report on the Implementation of RKL-RPL Construction Phase II
2025
6. TTE – Natural Resources Management Permit (PSDA)
11
Page 14
Appendix 2: TKBI-Alignment Assessment per Business Activity
1. Pakkat Hydropower Plant
Assessment Assessment
Green Criteria Explanation
Aspects Results
Activity - PT Energy Sakti Sentosa (ESS) is the operator company for the Pakkat hydropower plant which TBKI-
Classification: has a capacity of 18 MW (3x6 MW) and has been operating since 2020. Eligible
Pakkat hydropower activities are categorized into KBLI 35101 (2017) / KBLI 35111 (2020), namely
KBLI 35101 (2017) / Electricity Generation or KBLI 35120 (2025), namely Electricity Generation from Renewable
KBLI 35111 (2020) / Energy Sources. This KBLI includes groups that include efforts to produce electricity through
KBLI 35120 (2025) electricity generation that uses various types of energy sources, including flow energy sources
and waterfalls.
Environmental EO1 hydropower source categories: 1. PT ESS has an Electricity Supply Business License (IUPTL) Number 1/IUPTL-PB/PMDN/2017. Green
Objective (EO): 1) Business License in the This permit is an amendment to the previous permit to accommodate the increase in power
Electricity Sector (IUPTLU generation capacity from 2x5 MW to 3x6 MW. The Business License states that PT ESS
EO1: Climate and/or IUPTLS) operates the Pakkat hydropower plant by utilizing water energy sources from the Aek Sirahar
Change Mitigation 2) Using run-off-river; or use a River (Sirahar River Basin).
reservoir with a power density of 2. The Pakkat hydropower plant uses the Run-of-River (RoR) concept based on the following
>4W/m2; or Lifecycle emissions documents:
from all power generation a. The Environmental Evaluation Document (DELH) of the Pakkat hydropower plant in
facilities <100 gCO2e/kWh 2017 explains that the operation of the plant is carried out by utilizing the potential of
the Aek Sirahar River water resources through the diversion of water discharge through
(TKBI Version 3, p. 102) a waterway (tunnel) to the powerhouse, and the water is then returned to the Aek Sirahar
River through a tail race. The construction of the Pakkat hydropower dam is of the fixed
gravity concrete type which functions to raise the water level so that it can be diverted
to the intake.
b. b. PT Energy Sakti Sentosa Environmental Permit Number: 542/ILingk/DPMP2TSP/2017,
which stipulates that the company is granted a permit to carry out a hydropower
business of 3x 6 MW with the scope: environmental hue, impacts that occur,
environmental management and monitoring efforts and work programs according to
environmental documents. This permit is valid for the same period of time as the
business license.
c. Environmental Permit Report for Semester I & II of 2025, which explicitly states: "The
3x6 MW Pakkat hydropower plant operates using the concept of run of river, namely
utilizing the Aek Sirahar river flow" with a watershed area of ±251 km².
12
Page 15
Essential Criteria Have at least PROPER BLUE or meet 1. The Pakkat hydropower plant has an environmental approval in the form of an Green
(EC): the following criteria: Environmental Permit through the Decree of the Head of the Investment and One-Stop
1) Environmental Approval can be Integrated Licensing Service Office of Humbang Hasundutan Regency Number:
DNSH (Do Not in the form of 542/ILingk/DPMP2TSP/2017. The operation of the hydropower plant is also based on the
Significant Harm) AMDAL/UKL/UPL/SPPL 2017 Environmental Evaluation Document (DELH) which was prepared as the basis for the
documents. implementation of environmental management and monitoring.
2) Activities need to manage risks 2. The Pakkat hydropower plant conducts risk management related to the potential for a
that have the potential to reduce decrease in water quality and quantity based on the following documents:
water quality and disrupt water a. The 2017 Pakkat hydropower project DELH document, which establishes a management
quantity by consuming water at plan and monitoring the risk of water quality degradation through regular river water
a reasonable level and having a sampling and laboratory analysis. The main focus is to ensure that the physical and
water use plan and conservation chemical parameters of the water still meet the quality standards set by the government.
management in accordance b. Environmental Permit Report Semester I & II Year 2025:
with applicable regulations. PT ESS prepares and submits reports on the implementation of environmental
management plans (RKL) and environmental monitoring plans (RPL) every semester to
(TKBI Version 3, p.743) relevant agencies. Water quality monitoring is carried out periodically in strategic
locations, namely in the Weir Area (Inlet) and around Power Houses (Outlets). The
measured parameters include physical parameters (TSS, TDS, Temperature) and
chemical parameters (pH, COD, BOD, DO).
The results of the water quality analysis for the first semester of 2025 show that all
parameters monitored are below the threshold value (Quality Standards) in accordance
with Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021, so that the water quality is relatively good.
In the second semester of 2025, geo-physical-chemical testing (including surface water)
cannot be carried out because of a landslide disaster in December 2025 that
accumulated river flows and caused plant operations to be temporarily halted.
c. PT ESS is currently coordinating with the Ministry of Environment through an application
letter No. 026/ESS-Leg/VII/2026 dated July 15, 2026, regarding the request for direction
of environmental documents. This aims to ensure that there is a basis for the
implementation of the environmental management of the rehabilitation activities that
are being carried out.
Essential Criteria Related PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk as the Holding company has established a Policy on Respect and Green
(EC): policies/guidelines/practices: Protection of Human Rights through the Decree of the Board of Directors No. 57/SK-DIR/LEG-
1) Protection and Respect for KEL/XII/2024. PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk and all its subsidiaries are committed to ensuring
Social Aspects Human Rights that all operational activities are based on universally recognized human rights principles,
2) Employment includes decent including but not limited to:
work, prevention of forced 1. Non-discrimination
13
Page 16
labour, protection of women and 2. Forced Labor and Child Labor
child workers, and human 3. Occupational Health and Safety (K3)
resource development 4. Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining
3) Impact on people living close to 5. Decent Wages
investment, including job
creation, poverty reduction and
economic growth
(TKBI Version 3, p. 863)
Based on the explanation above, the Pakkat hydropower business activities meet the requirements of TKBI (Taxonomy-Aligned) of the GREEN
classification.
2. Air Putih Hydropower Plant
Assessment Assessment
Green Criteria Explanation
Aspects Results
Activity - PT Bangun Tirta Lestari (BTL) is the operator company for the Air Putih hydropower plant which TBKI-
Classification: has a capacity of 21 MW and has been operating since January 22, 2020. Eligible
Air Putih hydropower activities are categorized into KBLI 35101 (2017) / KBLI 35111 (2020),
KBLI 35101 (2017) / namely Electricity Generation or KBLI 35120 (2025), namely Electricity Generation from
KBLI 35111 (2020) / Renewable Energy Sources. This KBLI includes groups that include efforts to produce electricity
KBLI 35120 (2025) through electricity generation that uses various types of energy sources, including flow energy
sources and waterfalls.
Environmental EO1 hydropower source categories: 1) Air Putih Hydropower Plant has an Electricity Provider Business License (IUPTL) Number Green
Objective (EO): 1) Business License in the 26/1/IUPTL-T/PMDN/2017 which was stipulated on October 23, 2017 and is valid for a
Electricity Sector (IUPTLU period of 30 (thirty) years and can be extended.
EO1: Climate and/or IUPTLS) 2) The Air Putih hydropower plant uses Run-off-River (RoR) based on the following documents:
Change Mitigation 2) Using run-off-river; or use a a. The Environmental Management Efforts (UKL) and Environmental Monitoring Efforts
reservoir with a power density of (UPL) document of the Air Putih Hydropower Plant in 2014 states that
>4W/m2; or Lifecycle emissions "The Air Putih hydropower plant is planned to use the concept of run-off river (ROR)
from all power generation where there is no reservoir in the upstream part of the Ketahunan River Hydropower
facilities <100 gCO2e/kWh Plant, which is the source of hydropower energy, which is diverted by using a dam built
perpendicular / cutting to the river flow" (p. 2-6)
(TKBI Version 3, p. 102) b. Extension of the Surface Water Extraction and Utilization Permit (SIPPA) to PT BTL
Number: 503/13.1184/05/DPMPTSP-P.3/2022, which states:
14
Page 17
PT Bangun Lestari Tirta Lestari obtained a permit to use water resources from the
Ketahunan River. This permit is valid for 5 years, from June 24, 2022 to July 24, 2027
and can be extended in accordance with applicable regulations.
c. The Environmental Permit Report for Semester I & II of 2025, it is written "In general,
the lay-out of the run-off river type power generation system utilizes the flow of water
from the Ketahunan River"
Essential Criteria Have at least PROPER BLUE or meet 1) The Air Putih hydropower plant has environmental approvals in the form of Environmental Green
(EC): the following criteria: Permits (Lebong Regent Decree Number 17 of 2015) and UKL-UPL in 2014.
1) Environmental Approval can be 2) Air Putih hydropower plant conducts risk management related to potential decline in water
DNSH (Do Not in the form of quality and quantity based on the following documents:
Significant Harm) AMDAL/UKL/UPL/SPPL a. UKL UPL HYDROPOWER PLANT Air Putih Year 2014, which states a plan to manage the
documents. risk of water quality and quantity decline in the form of water quality sampling and
2) Activities need to manage risks laboratory analysis as well as field observations at the construction and operation
that have the potential to reduce stages.
water quality and disrupt water b. Environmental Permit Report Semester I & II Year 2025:
quantity by consuming water at • PT BTL has compiled and delivered environmental management and monitoring
a reasonable level and having a activities every semester.
water use plan and conservation • PT BTL has been monitoring water quality every three months. Water quality analysis
management in accordance was carried out at 2 monitoring locations, namely Inlet and Outlet, with the
with applicable regulations. measured parameters being physical parameters (TSS, temperature), and
chemistry (COD, BOD)
(TKBI Version 3, p.743) • The results of the water quality analysis for the entire period (Quarter I, II, III, IV) of
2025 show that some of the parameters monitored do not exceed the Environmental
Quality Standards in Provincial Regional Regulation No.6 of 2005 concerning the
Determination of Cross-Regency/City River Quality Standards in Bengkulu Province
(Class II). However, the results of the BOD test on Inlets and Outlets in the fourth
quarter of 2025 exceeded the required quality standard value.
• Based on the document "Minutes of Environmental Monitoring" and "E-Jounal of the
University of Bengkulu", the results of surface water testing that exceeded the
quality standards were due to people's mining activities around the River and
Ketahuno River areas having a heavily polluted status. This indicates that water
pollution is not caused by the activities of the Air Putih hydropower plant.
• PT BTL has committed to carrying out mitigation efforts in the form of strengthening
periodic water quality monitoring and installing banners appealing to the public not
to dump waste into the river.
15
Page 18
Essential Criteria Related The Holding Company, PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk, has supporting documents in the form of Green
(EC): policies/guidelines/practices: a Decree of the Board of Directors No.57/SK-DIR/LEG-KEL/XII/2024 concerning the
1) Protection and Respect for Determination of the Policy of Respect and Protection of Human Rights Based on International
Social Aspects Human Rights Standards. The decision states that:
2) Employment includes decent PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk and all its subsidiaries are committed to ensuring that all
work, prevention of forced operational activities are based on universally recognized human rights principles, including but
labour, protection of women and not limited to:
child workers, and human 1. Non-discrimination
resource development 2. Forced Labor and Child Labor
3) The impact on people living 3. Occupational Health and Safety (K3)
close to investment includes job 4. Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining
creation, efforts to reduce 5. Decent Wages
poverty and economic growth.
(TKBI Version 3, p. 863)
Based on the explanation above, the business activities of the Air Putih hydropower plant meet the requirements of TKBI (Taxonomy-Aligned) of the
GREEN classification.
3. Madong Mini Hydropower Plant
Assessment Assessment
Green Criteria Explanation
Aspects Results
Activity - PT Nagata Dinamika Hidro Madong (PT NDHM) is the operator company for the Madong PLTM TBKI-
Classification: which has a capacity of 2 × 5 MW (10 MW). Eligible
Based on the classification of the Indonesian Business Field Standard Classification (KBLI), the
KBLI 35101 (2017) / business activities of the Madong PLTM are included in KBLI 35101 of 2017 and KBLI 35111 of
KBLI 35111 (2020) / 2020 which include Electricity Generation activities, as well as in KBLI 35120 of 2025 which is
KBLI 35120 (2025) classified as Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy Sources.
Environmental EO1 hydropower source categories: 1) Based on the document "NDHM - UPTL PLTM Madong. Pdf", it is known that PT Nagata Green
Objective (EO): 1) Business License in the Dinamika Hidro Madong as the operator of the Ma'dong PLTM has obtained an Electricity
Electricity Sector (IUPTLU Supply Business License (IUPTL) with Decree Number 15/1/IUPTL - T/PMA/2017 issued on
EO1: Climate and/or IUPTLS) October 31, 2017.
Change Mitigation 2) Using run-off-river; or use a 2) Based on the document "NDHM - Document DELH.pdf" does not explicitly list the use of the
reservoir with a power density of Run-of-River (ROR) scheme. However, the operational and technical description of the
>4W/m2; or Lifecycle emissions Madong PLTM project is explicitly described in the document "NDHM - Environmental Permit
from all power generation Report RKL RPL SMT I 2025 PLTM Madong" including; PLTM Madong is a Run-of-River (ROR)
facilities <100 gCO2e/kWh
16
Page 19
type building by optimizing the use of the Maiting River, the use of the dam as water level
(TKBI Version 3, p. 102) control, Conveying Channels/Tunnels, electromechanical, and ecological flow provisions.
Essential Criteria Have at least PROPER BLUE or meet 1. PLTM Madong has obtained an environmental permit, namely an Environmental Permit with Green
(EC): the following criteria: letter number: 297IL/DPMPTDP/XI/2021 concerning Environmental Permits for the Activity
1) Environmental Approval can be Plan for the Construction of the Madong Mini Hydro Power Plant in Lembang Madong and
DNSH (Do Not in the form of Lembang Paku, Dende Piongan Napo District, North Toraja Regency, South Sulawesi
Significant Harm) AMDAL/UKL/UPL/SPPL Province as attached in the "NDHM - Document DELH.pdf".
2. The potential environmental impact arising from the activities of the Madong PLTM, both in
documents.
the construction and operational stages, has been identified and managed in accordance
2) Activities need to manage risks with the geo-biological aspects of the EO3 criteria, especially related to water quality and
that have the potential to environmental conservation. Based on the results of the review of the "NDHM - Document
reduce water quality and DELH.pdf" document, it is known that PT NDMH has made efforts to identify, manage, and
disrupt water quantity by monitor environmental impacts as follows:
consuming water at a a. Based on the 2013 UKL-UPL document contained in the "NDHM - DELH Document," PT
NDHM has conducted a baseline analysis of water quality before the implementation of
reasonable level and having a
the construction of the Madong PLTM as a reference in environmental impact
water use plan and monitoring.
conservation management in b. Based on the DELH Document, the Company conducts periodic water quality
accordance with applicable monitoring every semester (six months) which includes physical, chemical, and
regulations. biological parameters, in accordance with the environmental monitoring provisions
listed in the UKL-UPL document and applicable quality standards.
(TKBI Version 3, p.743) c. The quality of the waters around the Madong PLTM in accordance with the
Environmental Permit Report for the first and second semesters of 2025 shows that the
quality of the waters around the Madong PLTM meets standard quality standards, both
physics, chemistry, and microbiology, but there is an increase in the BOD parameters
compared to the results of monitoring in 2024. However, all parameters monitored are
still below the required quality standards so that they still meet the applicable
regulations.
d. Based on the results of water quality monitoring from the aspect of aquatic biota in the
first and second semesters of 2025, no significant changes were found in the condition
of aquatic biota. The composition of aquatic organisms, including phytoplankton, is
maintained and still in accordance with the baseline conditions set in the 2013 UKL-UPL
document.
The parameters as a whole have met the quality standards even though in the check, the
parameters checked have not been consistent for upstream and downstream. Because the
17
Page 20
monitoring in 2025 has not been carried out consistently, the Company will conduct consistent
sample collection and checking for 2 points, in accordance with the provisions in UKL UPL 2013.
Essential Criteria Social Aspect Criteria for The Holding Company, PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk, has supporting documents in the form of Green
(EC): Corporate/Non-MSMEs: a Decree of the Board of Directors No.57/SK-DIR/LEG-KEL/XII/2024 concerning the
1) Protection and Respect for Determination of the Policy of Respect and Protection of Human Rights Based on International
Social Aspects Human Rights Standards. The decision states that:
2) Employment includes decent PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk and all its subsidiaries are committed to ensuring that all
work, prevention of forced operational activities are based on universally recognized human rights principles, including but
labour, protection of women and not limited to:
child workers, and human 1. Non-discrimination
resource development 2. Forced Labor and Child Labor
3) The impact on people living 3. Occupational Health and Safety (K3)
close to investment includes job 4. Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining
creation, efforts to reduce 5. Decent Wages
poverty and economic growth.
(TKBI Version 3, p. 863)
Based on the explanation above, the business activities of the Madong PLTM meet the requirements of TKBI (Taxonomy-Aligned) of the GREEN classification.
4. Ordi Hulu Mini Hydropower Plant
Assessment Assessment
Green Criteria Explanation
Aspects Results
Activity - PT Sumatra Energi Lestari (SEL) has obtained an Electricity Supply Business License (IUPTL) TBKI-
Classification: through the OSS system with license number 34/IUPTL/OSS/2019. Based on the Business Eligible
Identification Number (NIB) 9120305103607, this company is the manager and operator of the
KBLI 35101 (2017) / Ordi Hulu Mini-Hydro Power Plant (PLTM) with an installed capacity of 2x5 MW (10 MW). This
KBLI 35111 (2020) / project was built to support the provision of electricity needs in Pakpak Bharat Regency, North
KBLI 35120 (2025) Sumatra Province, precisely located in Pardomuan Village, Sitellu Tali Urang Julu District.
The activities of the Ordi Hulu PLTM are categorized into KBLI 35101 (2017) / namely Electricity
Generation or KBLI 35120 (2025), namely Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy
Sources. This KBLI includes groups that include efforts to produce electricity through electricity
generation that uses various types of energy sources, including flow energy sources and
waterfalls.
Environmental EO1 hydropower source categories: 1. PLTM Ordi Hulu has an Electricity Supply Business License (IUPTL) Number 9120305103607 Green
Objective (EO): which was set on October 1, 2019.
18
Page 21
EO1: Climate 1) Business License in the 2. Based on the results of the review of the Water Resources Exploitation Permit Document,
Change Mitigation Electricity Sector (IUPTLU although the term Run-of-River (ROR) is not explicitly mentioned, there is a strong indication
and/or IUPTLS) that the Ordi Hulu PLTM implements the Run-of-River scheme, which is supported by the
2) Using run-off-river; or use a following evidence:
reservoir with a power density of • The type of construction used includes weirs (weirs) and intakes. This configuration is
>4W/m2; or Lifecycle emissions in accordance with the working principle of Run-of-River Plant, which is to divert part of
from all power generation the river discharge to the waterway through raising the water level using a dam, without
facilities <100 gCO2e/kWh
damming and accommodating a large amount of water to form an artificial reservoir or
(TKBI Version 3, p. 102) lake.
• The use of water for power plant operations is circular, where the water that has been
used must be returned to the river as a water source without reducing natural discharge
or reducing water quality.
Essential Criteria Have at least PROPER BLUE or meet Based on a more in-depth review of the Environmental Management and Monitoring Green
(EC): the following criteria: Implementation Report for the first and second semesters of 2025, the following are the details
1) Environmental Approval can be of the Environmental Objective 3 (EO3) assessment related to ecosystem protection and
DNSH (Do Not in the form of biodiversity for the Ordi Hulu PLTM:
Significant Harm) AMDAL/UKL/UPL/SPPL 1) Environmental Approval Ownership (EIA/ESIA)
documents. PLTM Ordi Hulu already has an Environmental Permit document from the Pakpak Bharat
2) Activities need to manage risks Regency Government with Number 503/90/1215.210/VI/2022.
that have the potential to reduce
water quality and disrupt water 2) Water Quality and Quantity Risk Management
quantity by consuming water at Data Semester I 2025: Test results show the main parameters are below the threshold (BML 50
a reasonable level and having a mg/L for TSS; 6-9 for pH). The TSS value was recorded at 26.10 mg/L (outlet) and 22.40 mg/L
water use plan and conservation (inlet), while the pH was in the range of 7.20 (outlet) and 6.85 (inlet).
management in accordance Data for the second semester of 2025: Water quality consistency is maintained with TSS of 27.00
with applicable regulations. mg/L (outlet) and 30.00 mg/L (inlet) and pH in the range of 7.10 - 7.38.
The exploitation of water resources has received a permit from the Minister of PUPR (No.
(TKBI Version 3, p.743) 710/KPTS/M/2024) which requires the return of circulating water discharge without reducing the
amount of natural discharge of the river
Based on data from the Environmental Management and Monitoring Implementation Report for
the first and second semesters of 2025, all water test environmental parameters show
compliance with the applicable quality standards in Indonesia, supported by the legality of
environmental permits and complete water resource utilization permits.
Essential Criteria Related The Holding Company, PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk, has supporting documents in the form of Green
(EC): policies/guidelines/practices: a Decree of the Board of Directors No.57/SK-DIR/LEG-KEL/XII/2024 concerning the
19
Page 22
1) Protection and Respect for Determination of the Policy of Respect and Protection of Human Rights Based on International
Social Aspects Human Rights Standards. The decision states that:
2) Employment includes decent PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk and all its subsidiaries are committed to ensuring that all
work, prevention of forced operational activities are based on universally recognized human rights principles, including but
labour, protection of women and not limited to:
child workers, and human 1. Non-discrimination
resource development 2. Forced Labor and Child Labor
3) Impact on people living close to 3. Occupational Health and Safety (K3)
investment, including job 4. Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining
creation, poverty reduction and 5. Decent Wages
economic growth
(TKBI Version 3, p. 863)
Based on the explanation above, the business activities of the Ordi Hulu PLTM meet the requirements of TKBI (Taxonomy-Aligned) of the GREEN
classification.
5. Salu Noling Mini Hydropower Plant
Assessment Assessment
Green Criteria Explanation
Aspects Results
Activity - PT Tiara Tirta Energi has obtained an Electricity Supply Business License (IUPTL) through the OSS TBKI-
Classification: system with a license number 12130004411450003, which is strengthened by the Letter of the Eligible
Director of Electricity Business Development Number B-2932/TL.04/DLB.1/2024 related to the
KBLI 35101 (2017) / Fulfillment of IUPTLU's Commitments. PT Tiara Tirta Energi is the manager and operator of the
KBLI 35111 (2020) / Salu Noling Mini-Hydro Power Plant (PLTM) with an installed capacity of 2x5.8 MW (11.6 MW)
KBLI 35120 (2025) and a power contract of 10 MW.
The activities of the Salu Noling PLTM are categorized into KBLI 35101 (2017), namely Electricity
Generation or KBLI 35120 (2025), namely Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy
Sources. This KBLI includes groups that include efforts to produce electricity through electricity
generation that uses various types of energy sources, including flow energy sources and
waterfalls.
Environmental EO1 hydropower source categories: 1. In accordance with the document "TTE - IUPTL PLTM Salu Noling.pdf", PT Tiara Tirta Energi as Green
Objective (EO): 1) Business License in the the operator of PLTM Salu Noling has obtained an Electricity Supply Business License (IUPTL),
Electricity Sector (IUPTLU with license number: 12130004411450003 issued on September 3, 2024.
EO1: Climate and/or IUPTLS) 2. Based on the document "TTE - UKL-UPL PLTM Salu Noling.pdf" part II of the Salu Noling PLTM
Change Mitigation 2) Using run-off-river; or use a Activity Plan, the Salu Noling PLTM is planned to use the Run Off River (ROR) scheme in the use
reservoir with a power density of of Salu Noling river water.
20
Page 23
>4W/m2; or Lifecycle emissions 3. Based on the RKL-RPL Implementation Report (Environmental Permit Report) Semester I and
from all power generation II of 2025, the status of the Salu Noling PLTM project is currently still in the construction stage
facilities <100 gCO2e/kWh and has not yet been operational. Based on the evaluation until the end of the second semester
of 2025, the project has recorded significant physical progress compared to the previous period.
(TKBI Version 3, p. 102) Based on Figure 1.2 (Layout of the Salu Noling Power Plant), the plant design utilizes the flow of
the Salu Noling River by diverting water to the conveyor channel and returning it to the river after
it is used for generation. The configuration shows that the Salu Noling PLTM is designed with the
principle of run-of-river.
Essential Criteria Have at least PROPER BLUE or meet Based on a more in-depth review of the RKL-RPL Implementation Report for Semester I and II of Green
(EC): the following criteria: 2025, the following are the details of the Environmental Objective 3 (EO3) assessment related
1) Environmental Approval can be to ecosystem protection and biodiversity for the Salu Noling PLTM:
DNSH (Do Not in the form of
Significant Harm) AMDAL/UKL/UPL/SPPL 1. The project has met the administrative criteria of DNSH with the possession of
documents. Environmental Permit No. 010/SIL/DPMPTS/X/2017 and UKL-UPL recommendations.
2) Activities need to manage risks 2. Water Quality and Quantity Risk Management
that have the potential to reduce Based on the Environmental Permit Report for Semester I and II of 2025:
water quality and disrupt water The water quality parameters show a very significant improvement trend from Semester 1 to
quantity by consuming water at Semester 2:
a reasonable level and having a • Total Suspended Solids (TSS): In January 2025 monitoring (Semester 1), TSS levels were
water use plan and conservation recorded at 52 mg/L, which exceeded the Class II water quality standard (50 mg/L) due
management in accordance to excavation activities. However, in the January 2026 monitoring (Semester 2), the TSS
with applicable regulations. value dropped drastically to 10 mg/L, so that it again met the standard.
• Degree of Acidity (pH): The pH value in Semester 1 had reached 9.9 (alkaline) which
(TKBI Version 3, p.743) exceeded the quality standard range of 6–9. In Semester 2, this condition has been
corrected with a pH value that returns to normal in the range of 7.14 to 7.34.
• Total Dissolved Solids (TDS): The TDS parameter is consistently below the threshold
throughout 2025, with a value of 130 mg/L in Semester 1 and a drop to 30 mg/L in
Semester 2.
Essential Criteria Related The Holding Company, PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk, has supporting documents in the form of Green
(EC): policies/guidelines/practices: a Decree of the Board of Directors No.57/SK-DIR/LEG-KEL/XII/2024 concerning the
1) Protection and Respect for Determination of the Policy of Respect and Protection of Human Rights Based on International
Social Aspects Human Rights Standards. The decision states that:
2) Employment includes decent PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk and all its subsidiaries are committed to ensuring that all
work, prevention of forced operational activities are based on universally recognized human rights principles, including but
labour, protection of women and not limited to:
1. Non-discrimination
21
Page 24
child workers, and human 2. Forced Labor and Child Labor
resource development 3. Occupational Health and Safety (K3)
3) The impact on people living 4. Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining
close to investment includes job 5. Decent Wages
creation, efforts to reduce
poverty and economic growth.
(TKBI Version 3, p. 863)
Based on the explanation above, the business activities of PLTM Salu Noling meet the requirements of TKBI (Taxonomy-Aligned) GREEN
classification.
22
Page 25
Page 26
Daftar Isi
1. Informasi Umum ............................................................................................................ 1
2. Tim Reviu ....................................................................................................................... 1
3. Profil Perusahaan Tercatat ............................................................................................. 2
4. Prosedur Penilaian ........................................................................................................ 3
5. Analisa Penilaian ............................................................................................................ 4
5.1. Pemetaan Perusahaan Anak ............................................................................... 5
5.2. Penilaian Taksonomi Per Perusahaan Anak dan Aktivitas ..................................... 5
5.3. Penilaian Keuangan / Finansial ............................................................................ 7
5.4. Ringkasan Hasil Penilaian Tingkat Perusahaan Induk ........................................... 8
6. Opini............................................................................................................................ 10
7. Lampiran ..................................................................................................................... 11
Lampiran 1: Daftar Dokumen Pendukung Penilaian ........................................................... 11
Lampiran 2: Penilaian TKBI-Alignment per Aktivitas Usaha ................................................. 12
1. PLTA Pakkat...................................................................................................... 12
2. PLTA Air Putih ................................................................................................... 14
3. PLTM Madong ................................................................................................... 16
4. PLTM Ordi Hulu................................................................................................. 18
5. PLTM Salu Noling .............................................................................................. 20
ii
Page 27
1. Informasi Umum
Tanggal Penerbitan : 18 Agustus 2026
Laporan
Nomor Revisi Laporan : 0
Status Laporan : ☒ Final ☐ Draft ☐ Revisi
Nama Perusahaan : PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk (KEEN)
Nama Direksi Penanggung : Giat Widjaja
Jawab
Alamat Email : corporate.secretary@kencanaenergy.com
Nomor Telepon : 021-58900791
Alamat Kantor Pusat : Kencana Tower, 11th Floor, Business Park
Kebon Jeruk, Jl. Meruya Ilir Raya No. 88
Jakarta Barat 11620
Dokumen Penilaian : Dokumen Surat Pendaftaran dan Permohonan Penetapan
Saham Berbasis Hijau 2025
Tujuan Penilaian : Melaksanakan reviu eksternal dengan keluaran berupa
laporan penilaian dan opini independen terhadap
Dokumen Surat Pendaftaran dan Permohonan Penetapan
Saham Berbasis Hijau PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk
(KEEN) untuk Periode 2025.
Ruang Lingkup Ruang lingkup penilaian adalah sebagai berikut:
• Sektor Usaha adalah Sektor Energi, subsektor
Pembangkit Listrik (KBLI: 35101); (KBLI 2020: 35111);
(KBLI 2025: 35120).
• Batasan penilaian Tingkat Portofolio meliputi:
1. PT Energi Sakti Sentosa (ESS) yang
mengoperasikan PLTA Pakkat
2. PT Bangun Tirta Lestari (BTL) yang
mengoperasikan PLTA Air Putih
3. PT Nagata Dinamika Hidro Madong (NDHM) yang
mengoperasikan PLTM Madong
4. PT Sumatera Energi Lestari (SEL) yang
mengoperasikan PLTM Ordi Hulu
5. PT Tiara Tirta Energi (TTE) yang mengoperasikan
PLTM Salu Noling
Tingkat Jaminan : Terbatas
Periode penilaian 1 Januari – 31 Desember 2025
2. Tim Reviu
Nama Lembaga Reviu : PT Superintending Company of Indonesia (SUCOFINDO)
Eksternal (Persero)
Alamat Kantor Lembaga : Graha Sucofindo, Jl. Raya Pasar Minggu No.Kav. 34,
Reviu Eksternal RT.4/RW.1, Pancoran, Kec. Pancoran, Kota Jakarta
Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12780
Independent Reviewer : Dikman Purnama
Tim Reviu Eksternal : Lead: Putri Rafika Dewi
Anggota 1: Galuh Chynintya R.P.
Anggota 2: Reza Mochammad Fadhlur Rahman
1
Page 28
Anggota 3: Diah Nur Oktavia
Acuan Reviu Eksternal : 1. Taksonomi Keuangan Berkelanjutan Indonesia (TKBI)
2. WFE Green Equity Principles
Ringkasan Kesimpulan : ☒ Hijau
Penilaian ☐ Transisi
☐ Tidak Memenuhi
PT SUCOFINDO selaku Penyedia Reviu Eksternal telah
melakukan penilaian Tingkat Portofolio terhadap Dokumen
Surat Pendaftaran dan Permohonan Penetapan Saham
Berbasis Hijau PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk untuk periode
2025. Berdasarkan tinjauan penilaian, tidak ada hal yang
menjadi perhatian kami yang menyebabkan kami yakin
bahwa pernyataan saham berbasis hijau tersebut
mengandung salah saji yang material. Kami menyimpulkan
bahwa klaim PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk mengenai
klasifikasi Saham Berbasis Hijau untuk periode pelaporan
tahun 2025 telah memenuhi kriteria yang dipersyaratkan
dalam Penetapan Saham Berbasis Hijau, mengenai semua
hal yang material.
3. Profil Perusahaan Tercatat
PT Kencana Energi Lestari, Tbk. (KEEN) merupakan perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang
pengembangan dan penyedia tenaga listrik berbasis energi baru terbarukan (new and renewable
energy developer) yang beroperasi sebagai Independent Power Producer (IPP) di Indonesia.
Perseroan berfokus pada pengembangan, konstruksi, pengoperasian, hingga pemeliharaan
sistem pembangkit listrik berbasis energi baru terbarukan (EBT), khususnya Pembangkit Listrik
Tenaga Air (PLTA) serta beberapa inisiatif energi bersih lainnya seperti biomassa dan solar power.
PT Kencana Energi Lestari didirikan pada tahun 2008 sebagai bagian dari ekspansi bisnis
Kencana Group, sebuah kelompok usaha nasional yang memiliki portofolio bisnis di sektor
konstruksi, energi, dan infrastruktur. Sejak awal berdiri, Perseroan berkomitmen untuk
menyediakan energi bersih, berkelanjutan, dan andal guna memenuhi kebutuhan listrik nasional
yang terus mengalami peningkatan, serta mendukung percepatan transisi energi di Indonesia.
Dalam menjalankan model bisnisnya, Perseroan mengembangkan proyek -proyek pembangkit
listrik melalui skema Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) dengan PT PLN (Persero) sebagai offtaker
tenaga listrik. Seiring dengan perkembangan usahanya, Perseroan terus memperkuat portofolio
pembangkit energi terbarukan serta mengedepankan pengelolaan sumber daya alam yang
bertanggung jawab dan penerapan prinsip keberlanjutan. Pada tahun 2019, Perseroan
melaksanakan Penawaran Umum Perdana Saham (Initial Public Offering/IPO) dan resmi
mencatatkan sahamnya di Bursa Efek Indonesia dengan kode saham KEEN, sebagai bagian dari
upaya memperkuat kapasitas pendanaan dan mendukung pengembangan usaha di sektor
energi terbarukan.
Saat ini, Perusahaan telah aktif dalam pengembangan berbagai proyek energi terbarukan,
mencakup Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Air (PLTA), Biomassa (PLTBm), dan Surya (PLTS), yang telah
beroperasi maupun masih dalam tahap pengembangan.
2
Page 29
4. Prosedur Penilaian
Prosedur penilaian keselarasan portofolio Perusahaan Induk mengacu pada Lampiran 13 TKBI
Versi 3 tentang Penilaian TKBI pada Tingkat Portofolio (Gambar 1).
Gambar 1. Penilaian TKBI di tingkat Portofolio
Penilaian dilakukan secara bertahap. Proses dimulai dengan memetakan setiap perusahaan
anak dan investasi yang berada dalam lingkup portofolio, menilai aktivitas ekonomi masing-
masing perusahaan secara individual, lalu menggabungkan seluruh hasil penilaian untuk
memperoleh profil keselarasan TKBI pada tingkat Perusahaan Induk. Pendekatan ini penting
karena tingkat keselarasan portofolio tidak dapat langsung ditentukan hanya berdasarkan jenis
usaha atau nama perusahaan. Setiap perusahaan anak dapat memiliki beberapa aktivitas
dengan tingkat keselarasan yang berbeda, sehingga seluruh aktivitas perlu ditelaah terlebih
dahulu sebelum hasilnya dikonsolidasikan.
Tahap awal dilakukan melalui inventarisasi / pemetaan seluruh perusahaan anak, investasi,
dan aktivitas ekonomi yang berada dalam lingkup penilaian. Informasi yang dihimpun sekurang-
kurangnya mencakup nama perusahaan anak/investasi, nama dan deskripsi aktivitas usaha,
serta kode dan deskripsi KBLI. Data tersebut perlu disusun secara lengkap dan konsisten agar
setiap aktivitas dapat ditelusuri serta dikaitkan dengan perusahaan yang menjalankannya.
Pemetaan ini juga menjadi dasar untuk menentukan apakah suatu aktivitas telah termasuk
dalam ruang lingkup TKBI atau berstatus TKBI-eligible. Aktivitas yang belum tercakup dalam
sektor atau daftar aktivitas TKBI tetap dicatat, tetapi diperlakukan sebagai TKBI-non-eligible atau
out of scope.
Aktivitas yang termasuk dalam cakupan TKBI selanjutnya dinilai tingkat keselarasannya atau
TKBI-alignment pada tingkat aktivitas. Penilaian dilakukan menggunakan Technical Screening
Criteria (TSC) yang sesuai dengan sektor dan karakteristik aktivitas. Tahap ini diawali dengan
penilaian apakah aktivitas memberikan kontribusi yang memenuhi kriteria terhadap
Environmental Objective (EO) utama yang dipilih. Selanjutnya, penilaian Essential Criteria (EC)
setiap aktivitas untuk memastikan bahwa aktivitas usaha tidak menimbulkan kerusakan yang
signifikan terhadap aspek lain. Penilaian EC terdiri dari penilaian Do No Significant Harm (DNSH),
Remedial Measures to Transition (RMT) serta pemenuhan aspek sosial. Berdasarkan hasil
penilaian tersebut, setiap aktivitas dikelompokkan ke dalam kategori Hijau, Transisi, Tidak
Memenuhi Klasifikasi, atau TKBI-non-eligible. Kategori Hijau diberikan kepada aktivitas yang
memenuhi kriteria Hijau dalam TKBI, sedangkan kategori Transisi diberikan kepada aktivitas yang
3
Page 30
memenuhi kriteria transisi yang telah ditetapkan. Aktivitas yang termasuk dalam cakupan TKBI
tetapi tidak memenuhi kriteria Hijau maupun Transisi dicatat sebagai Tidak Memenuhi Klasifikasi.
Sementara itu, aktivitas yang belum memiliki cakupan atau kriteria penilaian dalam TKBI dicatat
sebagai TKBI-non-eligible.
Apabila satu perusahaan anak menjalankan lebih dari satu aktivitas ekonomi, hasil penilaian
setiap aktivitas terlebih dahulu diagregasikan untuk memperoleh profil keselarasan pada tingkat
entitas. Agregasi dapat menggunakan indikator Revenue, Capital Expenditure, atau Operating
Expenditure, sesuai dengan karakteristik usaha, tahap perkembangan aktivitas, dan tujuan
penilaian. Setiap perusahaan anak selanjutnya akan memiliki profil persentase yang
menunjukkan porsi aktivitas Hijau, Transisi, Tidak Memenuhi Klasifikasi, dan TKBI-non-eligible.
Profil tersebut kemudian digunakan sebagai dasar penilaian pada tingkat Perusahaan Induk.
Dalam proses agregasi portofolio, kontribusi masing-masing perusahaan anak dibobot
berdasarkan proporsinya terhadap total Revenue, CapEx, atau OpEx Perusahaan Induk.
Persentase pada setiap kategori di tingkat perusahaan anak dikalikan dengan bobot kontribusi
perusahaan tersebut, lalu dijumlahkan dengan hasil perusahaan anak lainnya. Dengan cara ini,
perusahaan anak dengan kontribusi finansial lebih besar akan memberikan pengaruh yang lebih
besar terhadap hasil penilaian portofolio.
Hasil akhir penilaian Perusahaan Induk disajikan dalam bentuk profil persentase portofolio,
bukan sebagai satu klasifikasi tunggal. Profil tersebut menunjukkan besarnya bagian portofolio
yang termasuk kategori Hijau, Transisi, Tidak Memenuhi Klasifikasi, dan TKBI-non-eligible atau
out of scope. Pendekatan ini memberikan gambaran yang lebih utuh mengenai kondisi portofolio
karena dapat menunjukkan aktivitas yang telah selaras, aktivitas yang masih berada dalam
proses transisi, aktivitas yang belum memenuhi persyaratan, serta aktivitas yang belum
tercakup dalam TKBI. Hasil tersebut juga dapat digunakan untuk menilai perkembangan
portofolio dari waktu ke waktu dan melihat perubahan arah investasi Perusahaan Induk.
5. Analisa Penilaian
Bagian ini menyajikan hasil asesmen keselarasan portofolio PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk
(KEEN) terhadap Taksonomi untuk Keuangan Berkelanjutan Indonesia (TKBI) Versi 3.
Mengingat struktur organisasi Perseroan sebagai perusahaan induk dengan berbagai entitas
anak di sektor pembangkitan tenaga listrik, penilaian dilakukan menggunakan pendekatan
Tingkat Portofolio Perusahaan Induk. Sejalan dengan kerangka kerja TKBI, evaluasi dilaksanakan
secara berjenjang: keselarasan diidentifikasi terlebih dahulu pada tingkat Aktivitas
menggunakan Technical Screening Criteria (TSC), yang kemudian diagregasi menjadi penilaian
keselarasan tingkat Entitas untuk setiap anak perusahaan, sebelum akhirnya dikonsolidasikan
secara kumulatif pada level Portofolio grup.
Pendapatan (Revenue) ditetapkan sebagai pendekatan agregasi utama dalam penilaian ini.
Pemilihan metrik ini didasarkan pada kondisi operasional entitas anak yang mayoritas telah
berada pada tahap beroperasi secara komersil, sehingga pendapatan dari penjualan listrik
menjadi ukuran paling tepat untuk menunjukkan seberapa besar bisnis Perusahaan Induk yang
sudah sesuai dengan klasifikasi hijau TKBI.
4
Page 31
Penilaian ini mencakup periode tahun 2025 dengan memanfaatkan data keuangan
tersegmentasi, dokumen perizinan, laporan operasional, serta data kinerja lingkungan dan
sosial dari masing-masing entitas anak. Seluruh angka keuangan yang digunakan merujuk pada
data dalam laporan keuangan yang telah diaudit. Oleh karena itu, penilaian ini berfokus pada
keselarasan taksonomi dan tidak mencakup prosedur audit atas laporan keuangan tersebut.
5.1. Pemetaan Perusahaan Anak
Langkah awal penilaian dilakukan dengan memetakan portofolio perusahaan induk menjadi
daftar investasi perusahaan anak secara individual. Berdasarkan Surat Permohonan Penetapan
Saham Berbasis Hijau yang diajukan PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk tahun 2025 kepada PT Bursa
Efek Indonesia, diketahui bahwa Perseroan menjalankan usaha pembangkitan listrik yang
bersumber dari energi baru terbarukan (EBT) melalui Perusahaan anak.
Hingga periode pelaporan 2025, PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk telah mengembangkan proyek
Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Air (PLTA) dan Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Minihidro (PLTM). Hasil
pemetaan Perusahaan anak PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk disajikan pada Tabel 3.1.
Tabel 3. 1. Pemetaan Perusahaan Anak PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk.
Tanggal Operasi
Aktivitas Persentase
No Perusahaan Anak Lokasi Komersial
Usaha Kepemilikan
(COD)
Kab. Humbang
PT Energy Sakti Sentosa
1 PLTA Pakkat Kasundutan, 31 Januari 2018 75,00%
(“ESS”)
Sumatera Utara
PT Bangun Tirta Lestari Kab. Lebong,
2 PLTA Air Putih 22 Januari 2020 98,40%
(“BTL”) Bengkulu
PT Nagata Dinamika Kab. Toraja Utara,
3 PLTM Madong 25 Maret 2022 74,42%
Hidro Madong (“NDHM”) Sulawesi Selatan
Kab. Pakpak
PT Sumatera Energi PLTM Ordi
4 Bharat, Sumatera 31 Maret 2024 90,00%
Lestari (“SEL”) Hulu
Utara
PT Tiara Tirta Energi PLTM Salu Kab. Luwu,
5 Belum beroperasi 75,00%
(“TTE”) Noling Sulawesi Selatan
5.2. Penilaian Taksonomi Per Perusahaan Anak dan Aktivitas
Penting untuk dipahami bahwa tidak seluruh aktivitas ekonomi yang tercantum dalam Klasifikasi
Baku Lapangan Usaha Indonesia (KBLI) masuk ke dalam cakupan Taksonomi untuk Keuangan
Berkelanjutan Indonesia (TKBI). Taksonomi ini hanya mencakup aktivitas-aktivitas yang dinilai
memberikan kontribusi substansial terhadap tujuan ekonomi, lingkungan, maupun sosial, yang
kemudian dikategorikan sebagai aktivitas TKBI-eligible.
Dalam proses penilaian ini, operasional dari masing-masing perusahaan anak diuraikan menjadi
aktivitas ekonomi individu berbasis kode KBLI untuk mengidentifikasi status eligibilitasnya.
Aktivitas yang teridentifikasi masuk dalam cakupan taksonomi selanjutnya dianalisis lebih
mendalam berdasarkan pemenuhan Tujuan Lingkungan (Environmental Objective/EO) Utama
serta Kriteria Esensial (EC). Analisis Kriteria Esensial ini mencakup penilaian Do No Significant
Harm (DNSH) dan pemenuhan Social Aspect (SA).
5
Page 32
Tabel berikut menyajikan hasil penilaian TKBI eligibility atas aktivitas ekonomi yang dijalankan
oleh grup usaha PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk berdasarkan ketentuan teknis dalam TKBI.
Tabel 3. 2. Penilaian TKBI-Eligibility terhadap Aktivitas Ekonomi PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk
Nama Perusahaan Aktivitas TKBI Skala Usaha dan
KBLI
Anak Usaha Eligibility Metode Penilaian
PT Energi Sakti PLTA Pakkat KBLI 35101 (2017) / KBLI 35111 TKBI- Korporasi - Technical
Sentosa (ESS) (2020) - Pembangkitan Tenaga Eligible Screening Criteria
Listrik atau (TSC)
KBLI 35120 (2025) - Pembangkitan
Tenaga Listrik dari Sumber Energi
Terbarukan.
PT Bangun Tirta PLTA Air Putih KBLI 35101 (2017) / KBLI 35111 TKBI- Korporasi - Technical
Lestari (BTL) (2020) - Pembangkitan Tenaga Eligible Screening Criteria
Listrik atau (TSC)
KBLI 35120 (2025) - Pembangkitan
Tenaga Listrik dari Sumber Energi
Terbarukan.
PT Nagata PLTM KBLI 35101 (2017) / KBLI 35111 TKBI- Korporasi - Technical
Dinamika Hidro Madong (2020) - Pembangkitan Tenaga Eligible Screening Criteria
Madong (NDHM) Listrik atau (TSC)
KBLI 35120 (2025) - Pembangkitan
Tenaga Listrik dari Sumber Energi
Terbarukan.
PT Sumater Energi PLTM Ordi KBLI 35101 (2017) / KBLI 35111 TKBI- Korporasi - Technical
Lestari (SEL) Hulu (2020) - Pembangkitan Tenaga Eligible Screening Criteria
Listrik atau (TSC)
KBLI 35120 (2025) - Pembangkitan
Tenaga Listrik dari Sumber Energi
Terbarukan.
PT Tirta Tiara PLTM Salu KBLI 35101 (2017) / KBLI 35111 TKBI- Korporasi - Technical
Energi (TTE) Noling (2020) - Pembangkitan Tenaga Eligible Screening Criteria
Listrik atau (TSC)
KBLI 35120 (2025) - Pembangkitan
Tenaga Listrik dari Sumber Energi
Terbarukan.
Berdasarkan hasil penilaian TKBI eligibility, seluruh aktivitas ekonomi yang dimiliki oleh PT
Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk dapat dikategorikan sebagai TKBI-Eligible, sebagaimana ditunjukan
pada Tabel 3.2. Dengan demikian, proses penilaian tingkat aktivitas dapat dilanjutkan ke tahap
berikutnya, yaitu menilai apakah setiap aktivitas memenuhi persyaratan klasifikasi TKBI: Hijau,
Transisi, atau Tidak Memenuhi Klasifikasi. Table 3.3 menunjakkan Kesimpulan hasil penilaian
TKBI-alignment untuk setiap aktivitas usaha PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk (KEEN). Secara rinci,
penilaian TKBI-alignment disajikan pada Lampiran 2.
Tabel 3. 3. Ringkasan Penilaian TKBI-Alignment terhadap Aktivitas Ekonomi PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk
Anak Aktivitas Penilaian Taksonomi (TKBI - Alignment)
No
Perusahaan Perusahaan EO EC Aspek Sosial Klasifikasi
EO1 Climate
PT Energy Sakti DNSH: Aspek Sosial:
1 PLTA Pakkat Change Hijau
Sentosa (“ESS”) memenuhi Memenuhi
Mitigation
6
Page 33
EO1 Climate
PT Bangun Tirta DNSH: Aspek Sosial:
2 PLTA Air Putih Change Hijau
Lestari (“BTL”) memenuhi Memenuhi
Mitigation
EO1 Climate
PT Tiara Tirta PLTM Salu DNSH: Aspek Sosial:
3 Change Hijau
Energi (“TTE”) Noling memenuhi Memenuhi
Mitigation
PT Sumatera EO1 Climate
PLTM Ordi DNSH: Aspek Sosial:
4 Energi Lestari Change Hijau
Hulu memenuhi Memenuhi
(“SEL”) Mitigation
PT Nagata EO1 Climate
DNSH: Aspek Sosial:
5 Dinamika Hidro PLTM Madong Change Hijau
memenuhi Memenuhi
Madong (“NDHM”) Mitigation
5.3. Penilaian Keuangan / Finansial
Penilaian keuangan/finansial mengacu pada standar WFE Green Equity Principles yang memiliki
kriteria sebagai berikut:
Green Equity 1) Tahap Pendapatan: >50% total pendapatan tahunan tergolong hijau,
Designation atau
2) Tahap Pra-Pendapatan: >50% investasi (Opex atau Capex)
berkontribusi pada ekonomi hijau
Green Equity 1) Tahap Pendapatan: >50% total pendapatan tahunan tergolong hijau,
Transition atau
Designation 2) Tahap Pra-Pendapatan: >50% investasi (Opex atau Capex)
dialokasikan pada aktivitas yang terklasifikasi sebagai hijau atau
transisi.
Penilaian dilakukan berdasarkan Laporan Keuangan PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk tahun 2025.
Aktivitas usaha Perusahaan Anak seluruhnya berada di tahap pendapatan sehingga penilaian
menggunakan indikator Pendapatan (Revenue) aktivitas hijau. Berikut rincian penilaian
keuangan/finansial:
Tabel 3.4 Penilaian Keuangan / Finansial PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk
Penilaian Keuangan Hijau Tingkat Portofolio
C= E=
A B D F=CxE
Perusa Aktivitas (B/A) x 100% (D/B) x 100%
Penilaian % Agregasi
No haan Perusaha Revenue Green % Green
Taksonomi Total Revenue % Revenue Pendapatan
Anak an Perusaha Revenue Revenue
Perusahaan Perusahaan Hijau per
an Induk Perusahaan Perusahaan
Anak (USD) Anak Perusahaan
(USD) Anak (USD) Anak
Anak
PLTA
1 PT ESS Hijau 5.690.867 16,58% 5.690.867 100,00% 16,58%
Pakkat
PLTA Air
2 PT BTL Hijau 9.201.621 26,80% 9.201.621 100,00% 26,80%
Putih
34.333.492
PLTM Salu
3 PT TTE Hijau 10.530.605 30,67% 10.530.605 100,00% 30,67%
Noling
PLTM Ordi
4 PT SEL Hijau 4.002.027 11,66% 4.002.027 100,00% 11,66%
Hulu
7
Page 34
PT PLTM
5 Hijau 4.870.242 14,19% 4.870.242 100,00% 14,19%
NDHM Madong
% Pendapatan Hijau Portofolio 99,89%
Klasifikasi HIJAU
*Sumber data Pendapatan: Laporan Keuangan PT Kencana Energi Lesteri Tbk Tahun 2025
Berdasarkan Tabel 3.4, PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk memiliki pendapatan hijau tingkat
portofolio sebesar 99,89% pada periode 2025. Oleh karena itu, PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk
telah memenuhi kriteria Hijau dan terklasifikasi sebagai HIJAU.
5.4. Ringkasan Hasil Penilaian Tingkat Portofolio
Nama Organisasi : PT Kencana Energi Lestari, Tbk
Kode Perusahaan Tercatat : KEEN
Sektor / Subsektor : Energi / Pembangkit Listrik (KBLI 2025: 35120)
Program/Mekanisme : IDX Green Equity Designation
Standar Acuan : 1. Taksonomi Keuangan Berkelanjutan Indonesia (TBKI)
2. WFE Green Equity Principles
Ruang Lingkup : Level Portofolio - Perusahaan Induk
Periode Penilaian : 1 Januari 2025 – Desember 2025
8
Page 35
Penilaian Keuangan /
Penilaian Taksonomi (TKBI - Alignment)
Finansial
Perusahaan Aktivitas Kode Aktivitas / Sektor / %
No % Agregasi
Anak Perusahaan KBLI Subsektor Pendapatan
EO EC Aspek Sosial Klasifikasi Pendapatan
Hijau
Hijau
Portofolio
PT Energy Sakti KBLI 35101 [2017]/ Energi, EO1 Climate DNSH: Aspek Sosial:
1 Sentosa PLTA Pakkat KBLI 35111 [2020]/ Pembangkit Change memenuhi Memenuhi Hijau 16,58%
(“ESS”) KBLI 35120 [2025]/ Listrik Mitigation
PT Bangun KBLI 35101 [2017]/ Energi, EO1 Climate DNSH: Aspek Sosial:
PLTA Air Pembangkit Change memenuhi Memenuhi
2 Tirta Lestari KBLI 35111 [2020]/ Hijau 26,80%
Putih Listrik Mitigation
(“BTL”) KBLI 35120 [2025]/
KBLI 35101 [2017]/ Energi, EO1 Climate DNSH: Aspek Sosial:
PT Tiara Tirta PLTM Salu Pembangkit Change memenuhi Memenuhi
3 KBLI 35111 [2020]/ Hijau 30,67% 99,89%
Energi (“TTE”) Noling Listrik Mitigation
KBLI 35120 [2025]/
PT Sumatera KBLI 35101 [2017]/ Energi, EO1 Climate DNSH: Aspek Sosial:
PLTM Ordi Pembangkit Change memenuhi Memenuhi
4 Energi Lestari KBLI 35111 [2020]/ Hijau 11,66%
Hulu Listrik Mitigation
(“SEL”) KBLI 35120 [2025]/
PT Nagata Energi, EO1 Climate DNSH: Aspek Sosial:
KBLI 35101 [2017]/
Dinamika PLTM Pembangkit Change memenuhi Memenuhi
5 KBLI 35111 [2020]/ Hijau 14,19%
Hidro Madong Madong Listrik Mitigation
KBLI 35120 [2025]/
(“NDHM”)
Berdasarkan penilaian “TKBI-aligned”, Konglomerasi dari Perusahaan Induk PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk (KEEN) memiliki porsi klasifikasi “Hijau”
sebesar 99,89%.
9
Page 36
6. Opini
Laporan penilaian dan pernyataan opini terhadap Dokumen Surat Pendaftaran dan Permohonan
Penetapan Saham Berbasis Hijau PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk (KEEN) pada periode 2025,
merupakan tanggungjawab sepenuhnya dari Penyedia Reviu Eksternal, PT SUCOFINDO.
Sedangkan entitas pemohon PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk, bertanggungjawab atas penyajian
klaim pernyataan dan informasi dalam Dokumen Surat Pendaftaran dan Permohonan Penetapan
Saham Berbasis Hijau.
Proses penilaian dilakukan oleh PT SUCOFINDO melalui dua skema, yaitu (1) Penilaian
Taksonomi yang mengacu pada TKBI Versi 3, dengan menggunakan penilaian Tingkat Portofolio
metode Technical Screening Criteria (TSC); dan (2) Penilaian Keuangan yang mengacu pada WFE
Green Equity Principles. Data yang diperiksa bersifat historis, mencakup Dokumen Surat
Pendaftaran dan Permohonan Penetapan Saham Berbasis Hijau tahun 2025, Laporan Keuangan
dan Keberlanjutan tahun 2025 serta dokumen pendukung lainnya berupa dokumen teknis dan
perizinan.
Berdasarkan tinjauan penilaian yang dilakukan PT SUCOFINDO, tidak ada hal yang menjadi
perhatian kami yang menyebabkan kami yakin bahwa pernyataan saham berbasis hijau tersebut
mengandung salah saji yang material. Kami menyimpulkan bahwa klaim PT Kencana Energi
Lestari Tbk mengenai klasifikasi Saham Berbasis Hijau untuk periode pelaporan tahun 2025 telah
memenuhi kriteria yang dipersyaratkan dalam Penetapan Saham Berbasis Hijau, dalam semua
hal yang material.
Seluruh proses penilaian telah dilaksanakan secara independen dan bebas dari konflik
kepentingan, termasuk kepentingan pribadi, finansial, maupun hubungan lain yang dapat
mempengaruhi objektivitas penilaian. Pernyataan Opini ini adalah benar, akurat dan lengkap.
Jakarta, 18 Agustus 2026
Putri Rafika Dewi Dikman Purnama
Lead Reviu Eksternal Independent Reviewer
10
Page 37
7. Lampiran
Lampiran 1: Daftar Dokumen Pendukung Penilaian
1. Laporan Keuangan PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tahun 2025
2. Laporan Keberlanjutan PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tahun 2025
3. Penetapan Kebijakan Penghormatan dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Berdasarkan
Standar Internasional (Surat Keputusan Direksi No.57/SK-DIR/LEG-KEL/XII/2024)
4. Dokumen Teknis dan Perizinan per Perusahaan Anak dan Aktivitas
Perusahaan Aktivitas
Dokumen Teknis dan Perizinan
Anak Usaha
PT Energi Sakti PLTA 1. ESS - IUPTL PLTA Pakkat
Sentosa Pakkat 2. ESS - Izin Lingkungan PLTA Pakkat
(“ESS”) 3. ESS - DELH PLTA Pakkat
4. ESS - Laporan Izin Lingkungan Semester 1 2025
5. ESS - Laporan Izin Lingkungan Semester 2 2025
6. ESS - 026 – Surat Permohonan (Arahan DLH)
PT Bangun Tirta PLTA Air 1. BTL - IUPTL PLTA Air Putih
Lestari (“BTL”) Putih 2. BTL - Izin Lingkungan PLTA Air Putih
3. BTL - UKL UPL PLTA Air Putih
4. BTL - SIPPA PLTA Air Putih
5. BTL - Laporan Izin Lingkungan Semester 1 2025
6. BTL - Laporan Izin Lingkungan Semester 2 2025
7. BTL - Berita Acara Pengawasan Lingkungan Hidup
8. BTL - E-Jounal Universitas Bengkulu
PT Nagata PLTM 1. NDHM - Izin Usaha Pembangkit Tenaga Listrik (IUPTL) PLTM Madong
Dinamika Hidro Madong 2. NDHM - Dokumen Evaluasi Lingkungan Hidup (DELH) PLTM Madong
Madong 3. NDHM - Izin Lingkungan PLTM Madong
(“NDHM”) 4. NDHM - Laporan Izin Lingkungan RKL RPL SMT I 2025 PLTM Madong
5. NDHM - Laporan Izin Lingkungan RKL RPL SMT II 2025 PLTM Madong
6. NDHM – Izin Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam (PSDA)
PT Sumatera PLTM Ordi 1. SEL - Izin Usaha Pembangkit Tenaga Listrik (IUPTL) PLTM Ordi Hulu
Energi Lestari Hulu 2. SEL - Izin Lingkungan PLTM Ordi Hulu
(“SEL”) 2. SEL - Laporan Izin Lingkungan Semester I 2025
3. SEL - Laporan Izin Lingkungan Semester II 2025
4. SEL - Izin Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam (PSDA)
PT Tiara Tirta PLTM Salu 1. TTE - Izin Usaha Pembangkit Tenaga Listrik (IUPTL) PLTM Salu Noling
Energi (“TTE”) Noling 2. TTE - UKL UPL PLTM Salu Noling
3. TTE - Izin Lingkungan PLTM Salu Noling
4. TTE - Laporan Pelaksanaan RKL-RPL Tahap Konstruksi Semester I
2025
5. TTE - Laporan Pelaksanaan RKL-RPL Tahap Konstruksi Semester II
2025
6. TTE – Izin Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam (PSDA)
11
Page 38
Lampiran 2: Penilaian TKBI-Alignment per Aktivitas Usaha
1. PLTA Pakkat
Aspek Penilaian Kriteria Hijau Penjelasan Hasil
Penilaian
Klasifikasi Aktivitas: - PT Energy Sakti Sentosa (ESS) merupakan perusahaan operator untuk PLTA Pakkat yang TBKI-
memiliki kapasitas 18 MW (3x6 MW) dan telah beroperasi sejak tahun 2020. Eligible
KBLI 35101 (2017) / Aktivitas PLTA Pakkat terkategori kedalam KBLI 35101 (2017) / KBLI 35111 (2020) yaitu
KBLI 35111 (2020) / Pembangkitan Tenaga Listrik atau KBLI 35120 (2025), yaitu Pembangkitan Tenaga Listrik dari
KBLI 35120 (2025) Sumber Energi Terbarukan. KBLI ini mencakup kelompok yang mencakup usaha memproduksi
tenaga Listrik melalui pembangkitan tenaga Listrik yang menggunakan berbagai jenis sumber
energi, termasuk sumber energi aliran dan terjunan air.
Environmental Kategori EO1 sumber energi tenaga 1. PT ESS memiliki Izin Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (IUPTL) Nomor 1/IUPTL- Hijau
Objective (EO): air: PB/PMDN/2017. Izin ini merupakan perubahan atas izin sebelumnya untuk mengakomodasi
1) Izin Berusaha di Bidang peningkatan kapasitas pembangkit dari 2x5 MW menjadi 3x6 MW. Izin Usaha tersebut
EO1: Climate Ketenagalistrikan (IUPTLU menyebutkan bahwa PT ESS mengoperasikan PLTA Pakkat dengan memanfaatkan sumber
Change Mitigation dan/atau IUPTLS) energi air dari Sungai Aek Sirahar (Daerah Aliran Sungai Sirahar).
2) Menggunakan run-off-river; atau 2. PLTA Pakkat menggunakan konsep Run-of-River (RoR) berdasarkan dokumen-dokumen
menggunakan waduk dengan berikut:
power density >4W/m2; atau a. Dokumen Evaluasi Lingkungan Hidup (DELH) PLTA Pakkat tahun 2017 yang
Lifecycle emissions dari seluruh menjelaskan bahwa operasional pembangkit dilakukan dengan memanfaatkan potensi
fasilitas pembangkit listrik <100 sumber daya air Sungai Aek Sirahar melalui pengalihan debit air melalui waterway
gCO2e/kWh (tunnel) menuju powerhouse, dan air tersebut kemudian dikembalikan lagi ke Sungai
Aek Sirahar melalui tail race. Konstruksi bendung PLTA Pakkat bertipe fixed gravity
(TKBI Versi 3, hal. 102) concrete yang berfungsi untuk menaikkan muka air agar dapat dialihkan ke intake.
b. b. Izin Lingkungan PT Energy Sakti Sentosa Nomor: 542/ILingk/DPMP2TSP/2017, yang
menetapkan bahwa perusahaan diberikan izin untuk melakukan usaha PLTA sebesar 3x
6 MW dengan ruang lingkup: rona lingkungan, dampak-dampak yang terjadi, upaya
pengelolaan dan pemantauan lingkungan serta program kerja sesuai dokumen
lingkungan. Izin ini berlaku dengan jangka waktu yang sama dengan izin usaha.
c. Laporan Izin Lingkungan Semester I & II Tahun 2025, yang secara eksplisit menyatakan:
"PLTA Pakkat 3x6 MW beroperasi menggunakan konsep run of river, yaitu
memanfaatkan aliran sungai Aek Sirahar" dengan daerah aliran sungai seluas ±251 km².
Essential Criteria Memiliki PROPER minimal BIRU atau 1. PLTA Pakkat memiliki persetujuan lingkungan berupa Izin Lingkungan melalui Keputusan Hijau
(EC): memenuhi kriteria berikut: Kepala Dinas Penanaman Modal dan Pelayanan Perizinan Terpadu Satu Pintu Kabupaten
Humbang Hasundutan Nomor: 542/ILingk/DPMP2TSP/2017. Operasional PLTA juga
12
Page 39
DNSH (Do Not 1) Persetujuan Lingkungan dapat didasarkan pada Dokumen Evaluasi Lingkungan Hidup (DELH) tahun 2017 yang disusun
Significant Harm) berupa dokumen sebagai dasar pelaksanaan pengelolaan dan pemantauan lingkungan hidup.
AMDAL/UKL/UPL/SPPL. 2. PLTA Pakkat melakukan pengelolaan risiko terkait potensi penurunan kualitas dan kuantitas
2) Aktivitas perlu mengelola risiko air berdasarkan dokumen berikut:
yang berpotensi menurunkan a. Dokumen DELH PLTA Pakkat Tahun 2017, yang menetapkan rencana pengelolaan dan
kualitas air dan mengganggu pemantauan risiko penurunan kualitas air melalui pengambilan sampel air sungai dan
kuantitas air dengan melakukan analisis laboratorium secara berkala. Fokus utama adalah memastikan parameter fisik
konsumsi air pada tingkat yang dan kimia air tetap memenuhi baku mutu yang ditetapkan pemerintah.
wajar serta memiliki rencana b. Laporan Izin Lingkungan Semester I & II Tahun 2025:
penggunaan air dan pengelolaan PT ESS menyusun dan menyampaikan laporan pelaksanaan rencana pengelolaan
konservasi sesuai dengan lingkungan (RKL) dan rencana pemantauan lingkungan (RPL) setiap semester kepada
ketentuan yang berlaku. instansi terkait. Pemantauan kualitas air dilakukan secara berkala di lokasi strategis,
yaitu di Area Bendung (Inlet) dan Sekitar Power House (Outlet). Parameter yang diukur
(TKBI Versi 3, hal.743) meliputi parameter fisika (TSS, TDS, Suhu) dan parameter kimia (pH, COD, BOD, DO).
Hasil analisa kualitas air Semester I Tahun 2025 menunjukkan bahwa seluruh parameter
yang dipantau berada di bawah nilai ambang batas (Baku Mutu) sesuai PP No. 22 Tahun
2021, sehingga kualitas air tergolong baik. Pada Semester II Tahun 2025 tidak dapat
dilakukan pengujian geo-fisik-kimia (termasuk air permukaan) karena terjadi bencana
longsor pada Desember 2025 yang menimbun aliran sungai dan menyebabkan
operasional pembangkit berhenti sementara.
c. PT ESS telah menyampaikan Surat Permohonan (ESS – 026 – Surat Permohonan (Arahan
DLH)) kepada Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup, perihal permohonan arahan dokumen
lingkungan hidup. Hal ini bertujuan supaya terdapat dasar pelaksanaan pengelolaan
lingkungan terhadap kegiatan rehabilitasi yang sedang dilakukan.
Essential Criteria Kebijakan / pedoman / praktik terkait: PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk sebagai perusahaan induk telah menetapkan Kebijakan Hijau
(EC): 1) Perlindungan dan Penghormatan dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia melalui Surat Keputusan Direksi No.
Penghormatan HAM 57/SK-DIR/LEG-KEL/XII/2024. PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk dan seluruh anak Perusahaan
Aspek Sosial 2) Ketenagakerjaan mencakup berkomitmen untuk memastikan bahwa seluruh kegiatan operasional berdasarkan pada
pekerjaan layak, pencegahan prinsip-prinsip hak asasi manusia yang diakui secara universal, termasuk namun tidak terbatas
kerja paksa, perlindungan pada:
terhadap pekerja perempuan 1. Non-diskriminasi
dan anak, serta pengembangan 2. Kerja Paksa dan Pekerjaan Anak
sumber daya manusia 3. Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3)
3) Dampak terhadap masyarakat 4. Kebebasan Berserikat dan Berunding Bersama
yang tinggal dekat dengan 5. Upah yang Layak
investasi, mencakup
13
Page 40
penciptaan lapangan kerja,
upaya dalam mengurangi
kemiskinan dan pertumbuhan
ekonomi
(TKBI Versi 3, hal. 863)
Berdasarkan penjelasan diatas, aktivitas usaha PLTA Pakkat memenuhi persyaratan TKBI (Taxonomy-Aligned) klasifikasi HIJAU.
2. PLTA Air Putih
Aspek Penilaian Kriteria Hijau Penjelasan Hasil
Penilaian
Klasifikasi Aktivitas: - PT Bangun Tirta Lestari (BTL) merupakan perusahaan operator untuk PLTA Air Putih yang TBKI-
memiliki kapasitas 21 MW dan telah beroperasi sejak 22 Januari 2020. Eligible
KBLI 35101 (2017) / Aktivitas PLTA Air Putih terkategori kedalam KBLI 35101 (2017) / KBLI 35111 (2020) yaitu
KBLI 35111 (2020) / Pembangkitan Tenaga Listrik atau KBLI 35120 (2025), yaitu Pembangkitan Tenaga Listrik dari
KBLI 35120 (2025) Sumber Energi Terbarukan. KBLI ini mencakup kelompok yang mencakup usaha memproduksi
tenaga Listrik melalui pembangkitan tenaga Listrik yang menggunakan berbagai jenis sumber
energi, termasuk sumber energi aliran dan terjunan air.
Environmental Kategori EO1 sumber energi tenaga 1) PLTA Air Putih memiliki Izin Usaha Penyedia Tenaga Listrik (IUPTL) Nomor 26/1/IUPTL- Hijau
Objective (EO): air: T/PMDN/2017 yang ditetapkan tanggal 23 Oktober 2017 dan berlaku untuk jangka waktu 30
1) Izin Berusaha di Bidang (tiga puluh) tahun dan dapat diperpanjang.
EO1: Climate Ketenagalistrikan (IUPTLU 2) PLTA Air Putih menggunakan Run-off-River (RoR) berdasarkan dokumen berikut:
Change Mitigation dan/atau IUPTLS) a. Dokumen Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup (UKL) dan Upayan Pemantauan
2) Menggunakan run-off-river; atau Lingkungan Hidup (UPL) PLTA Air Putih tahun 2014 yang menyatakan bahwa
menggunakan waduk dengan "PLTA Air Putih direncanakan menggunakan konsep run-off river (ROR) dimana tidak
power density >4W/m2; atau terdapat tampungan pada bagian hulu PLTA Aliran Sungai Ketahun yang merupakan
Lifecycle emissions dari seluruh sumber energi PLTA dialihkan dengan menggunakan bendung yang dibangun tegak
fasilitas pembangkit listrik <100 lurus / memotong terhadap aliran sungai" (hal. 2-6)
gCO2e/kWh b. Perpanjangan Izin Pengambilan dan Pemanfaatan Air (SIPPA) Permukaan kepada PT
BTL Nomor: 503/13.1184/05/DPMPTSP-P.3/2022, yang menyatakan:
(TKBI Versi 3, hal. 102) PT Bangun Lestari Tirta Lestari mendapatkan izin menggunakan sumber daya air dari
Sungai Ketahun. Izin ini berlaku selama 5 tahun, mulai 24 Juni 2022 sampai dengan 24
Juli 2027 dan dapat diperpanjang sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku.
c. Laporan Izin Lingkungan Semester I & II Tahun 2025, tertulis "Secara umum lay-out
sistem pembangkit jenis run off river memanfaatkan aliran air Sungai Ketahun"
14
Page 41
Essential Criteria Memiliki PROPER minimal BIRU atau 1) PLTA Air Putih memiliki persetujuan lingkungan berupa Izin Lingkungan (Surat Keputusan Hijau
(EC): memenuhi kriteria berikut: Bupati Lebong Nomor 17 Tahun 2015) dan UKL-UPL tahun 2014.
1) Persetujuan Lingkungan dapat 2) PLTA Air Putih melakukan pengelolaan risiko terkait potensi penurunan kualitas dan
DNSH (Do Not berupa dokumen kuantitas air berdasarkan dokumen berikut:
Significant Harm) AMDAL/UKL/UPL/SPPL. a. UKL UPL PLTA Air Putih Tahun 2014, yang menyatakan rencana pengelolaan risiko
2) Aktivitas perlu mengelola risiko penurunan kualitas dan kuantitas air berupa pengambilan contoh kualitas air dan
yang berpotensi menurunkan analisa laboratorium serta pengamatan lapangan pada tahap konstruksi dan operasi.
kualitas air dan mengganggu b. Laporan Izin Lingkungan Semester I & II Tahun 2025:
kuantitas air dengan melakukan • PT BTL telah menyusun dan menyampaikan kegiatan pengelolaan dan pemantauan
konsumsi air pada tingkat yang lingkungan setiap semester.
wajar serta memiliki rencana • PT BTL telah melakukan pemantauan kualitas air setiap tiga bulan. Analisa kualitas
penggunaan air dan pengelolaan air dilakukan di 2 lokasi pemantaun yaitu Inlet dan Outlet, dengan parameter yang
konservasi sesuai dengan diukur adalah parameter fisika (TSS, suhu), serta kimia (COD, BOD)
ketentuan yang berlaku. • Hasil analisa kualitas air seluruh periode (Triwulan I, II, III, IV) Tahun 2025
menunjukkan bahwa beberapa parameter yang dipantau tidak melebihi Baku Mutu
(TKBI Versi 3, hal.743) Lingkungan pada Peraturan Daerah Propinsi No.6 Tahun 2005 tentang Penetapan
Baku Mutu Sungai Lintas Kabupaten/Kota dalam Provinsi Bengkulu (Kelas II). Tetapi
hasil uji BOD pada Inlet dan Outlet pada Triwulan IV 2025 melebihi nilai baku mutu
yang dipersyaratkan.
• Berdasarkan dokumen "Berita Acara Pengawasan Lingkungan Hidup” dan "E-Jounal
Universitas Bengkulu”, hasil pengujian air permukaan yang melebihi baku mutu
dikarenakan aktivitas penambangan rakyat disekitar area Sungai dan Sungai
Ketahun memiliki status tercemar berat. Hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa
pencemaran air tidak disebabkan oleh aktivitas PLTA Air Putih.
• PT BTL telah berkomitmen melakukan usaha mitigasi berupa memperkuat
pemantauan kualitas air berkala serta memasang spanduk himbauan kepada
masyarakat untuk tidak membuang limbah ke Sungai.
Essential Criteria Kebijakan / pedoman / praktik terkait: Perusahaan Induk, PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk, memiliki dokumen pendukung berupa Surat Hijau
(EC): 1) Perlindungan dan Penghormatan Keputusan Direksi No.57/SK-DIR/LEG-KEL/XII/2024 tentang Penetapan Kebijakan
HAM Penghormatan dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Berdasarkan Standar Internasional.
Aspek Sosial 2) Ketenagakerjaan mencakup Keputusan tersebut menyatakan bahwa:
pekerjaan layak, pencegahan PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk dan seluruh anak Perusahaan berkomitmen untuk memastikan
kerja paksa, perlindungan bahwa seluruh kegiatan operasional berdasarkan pada prinsip-prinsip hak asasi manusia yang
terhadap pekerja perempuan diakui secara universal, termasuk namun tidak terbatas pada:
dan anak, serta pengembangan 1. Non-diskriminasi
sumber daya manusia 2. Kerja Paksa dan Pekerjaan Anak
15
Page 42
3) Dampak terhadap masyarakat 3. Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3)
yang tinggal dekat dengan 4. Kebebasan Berserikat dan Berunding Bersama
investasi, mencakup 5. Upah yang Layak
penciptaan lapangan kerja,
upaya dalam mengurangi
kemiskinan dan pertumbuhan
ekonomi.
(TKBI Versi 3, hal. 863)
Berdasarkan penjelasan diatas, aktivitas usaha PLTA Air Putih memenuhi persyaratan TKBI (Taxonomy-Aligned) klasifikasi HIJAU.
3. PLTM Madong
Aspek Penilaian Kriteria Hijau Penjelasan Hasil
Penilaian
Klasifikasi Aktivitas: - PT Nagata Dinamika Hidro Madong (PT NDHM) merupakan perusahaan operator untuk PLTM TBKI-
Madong yang memiliki kapasitas 2 × 5 MW (10 MW). Eligible
KBLI 35101 (2017) / Berdasarkan klasifikasi Klasifikasi Baku Lapangan Usaha Indonesia (KBLI), kegiatan usaha PLTM
KBLI 35111 (2020) / Madong termasuk dalam KBLI 35101 Tahun 2017 dan KBLI 35111 Tahun 2020 yang mencakup
KBLI 35120 (2025) kegiatan Pembangkitan Tenaga Listrik, serta pada KBLI 35120 Tahun 2025 yang diklasifikasikan
sebagai Pembangkitan Tenaga Listrik dari Sumber Energi Terbarukan.
Environmental Kategori EO1 sumber energi tenaga 1) Berdasarkan dokumen "NDHM - UPTL PLTM Madong. Pdf", diketahui bahwa PT Nagata Hijau
Objective (EO): air: Dinamika Hidro Madong selaku operator PLTM Ma'dong telah memperoleh Izin Usaha
1) Izin Berusaha di Bidang Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (IUPTL) dengan Nomor Keputusan 15/1/IUPTL - T/PMA/2017 yang
EO1: Climate Ketenagalistrikan (IUPTLU diterbitkan pada 31 Oktober 2017.
Change Mitigation dan/atau IUPTLS) 2) Berdasarkan dokumen "NDHM - Dokumen DELH.pdf" tidak secara eksplisit mencantumkan
2) Menggunakan run-off-river; atau penggunaan skema Run-of-River (ROR). Namun, deskripsi operasional dan teknis proyek
menggunakan waduk dengan PLTM Madong secara explisipt terdiskripsi dalam dokumen "NDHM - Laporan Izin
power density >4W/m2; atau Lingkungan RKL RPL SMT I 2025 PLTM Madong" mencakup; PLTM Madong merupakan
Lifecycle emissions dari seluruh bangunan dengan tipe Run-of-River (ROR) dengan mengoptimalkan pemanfaatan Sungai
fasilitas pembangkit listrik <100 Maiting, penggunaan Bendung sebagai kontrol ketinggian air, Saluran
gCO2e/kWh Penghantar/Terowongan, electromechanical, serta ketentuan ecological flow.
(TKBI Versi 3, hal. 102)
Essential Criteria Memiliki PROPER minimal BIRU atau 1. PLTM Madong telah memperoleh izin lingkungan yaitu Surat Izin Lingkungan dengan nomor Hijau
(EC): memenuhi kriteria berikut: surat: 297IL/DPMPTDP/XI/2021 Tentang Izin Lingkungan Rencana Kegiatan Pembangunan
Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Mini Hidro Madong di Lembang Madong dan Lembang Paku
16
Page 43
DNSH (Do Not 1) Persetujuan Lingkungan dapat Kecamatan Dende Piongan Napo Kabupaten Toraja Utara Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan
Significant Harm) berupa dokumen sebagaimana terlampir dalam "NDHM - Dokumen DELH.pdf".
AMDAL/UKL/UPL/SPPL. 2. Potensi dampak lingkungan yang timbul dari kegiatan PLTM Madong, baik pada tahap
konstruksi maupun tahap operasional, telah diidentifikasi dan dikelola sesuai dengan aspek
2) Aktivitas perlu mengelola risiko
geo-biologis pada kriteria EO3, khususnya terkait kualitas air dan konservasi lingkungan.
yang berpotensi menurunkan Berdasarkan hasil penelaahan terhadap dokumen "NDHM - Dokumen DELH.pdf", diketahui
kualitas air dan mengganggu bahwa PT NDMH telah melakukan upaya identifikasi, pengelolaan, dan pemantauan
kuantitas air dengan melakukan dampak lingkungan sebagai berikut:
konsumsi air pada tingkat yang a. Berdasarkan dokumen UKL-UPL Tahun 2013 yang tertuang dalam "NDHM - Dokumen
wajar serta memiliki rencana DELH," PT Nagata Dinamika Hidro Madong telah melakukan analisis kondisi awal
(baseline) kualitas air sebelum pelaksanaan konstruksi PLTM Madong sebagai acuan
penggunaan air dan
dalam pemantauan dampak lingkungan.
pengelolaan konservasi sesuai b. Berdasarkan Dokumen DELH, Perseroan melaksanakan pemantauan kualitas air
dengan ketentuan yang berlaku. secara berkala setiap semester (enam bulan) yang mencakup parameter fisika, kimia,
dan biologis, sesuai dengan ketentuan pemantauan lingkungan yang tercantum dalam
(TKBI Versi 3, hal.743) dokumen UKL-UPL dan baku mutu yang berlaku.
c. Kualitas perairan di sekitar PLTM Madong sesuai dengan Laporan Izin Lingkungan
Semester I dan II tahun 2025 menunjukkan hasil bahwa, kualitas perairan sekitar PLTM
Madong memenuhi baku mutu standar, baik fisika, kimia, dan mikrobiologi, namun
terdapat peningkatan pada parameter BOD dibandingkan dengan hasil pemantauan
Tahun 2024. Namun demikian, seluruh parameter yang dipantau masih berada di bawah
baku mutu yang dipersyaratkan sehingga masih memenuhi ketentuan yang berlaku.
d. Berdasarkan hasil pemantauan kualitas air dari aspek biota perairan pada Semester I
dan II Tahun 2025, tidak ditemukan perubahan yang signifikan terhadap kondisi biota
perairan. Komposisi organisme perairan, termasuk fitoplankton, tetap terjaga dan
masih sesuai dengan kondisi baseline yang ditetapkan dalam dokumen UKL-UPL Tahun
2013.
Parameter secara keseluruhan sudah memenuhi baku mutu meskipun dalam pengecekannya,
parameter yang dicek belum konsisten untuk hulu dan hilir. Disebabkan pemantauan tahun
2025 belum dilakukan secara konsisten, Perusahaan akan melakukan pengambilan dan
pengecekan sampel secara konsisten untuk 2 titik, sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam UKL UPL
2013.
Essential Criteria Kriteria Aspek Sosial untuk Perusahaan Induk, PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk, memiliki dokumen pendukung berupa Surat Hijau
(EC): Korporasi/Non-UMKM: Keputusan Direksi No.57/SK-DIR/LEG-KEL/XII/2024 tentang Penetapan Kebijakan
1) Perlindungan dan Penghormatan dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Berdasarkan Standar Internasional.
Aspek Sosial Penghormatan HAM Keputusan tersebut menyatakan bahwa:
17
Page 44
2) Ketenagakerjaan mencakup PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk dan seluruh anak Perusahaan berkomitmen untuk memastikan
pekerjaan layak, pencegahan bahwa seluruh kegiatan operasional berdasarkan pada prinsip-prinsip hak asasi manusia yang
kerja paksa, perlindungan diakui secara universal, termasuk namun tidak terbatas pada:
terhadap pekerja perempuan 1. Non-diskriminasi
dan anak, serta pengembangan 2. Kerja Paksa dan Pekerjaan Anak
sumber daya manusia 3. Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3)
3) Dampak terhadap masyarakat 4. Kebebasan Berserikat dan Berunding Bersama
yang tinggal dekat dengan 5. Upah yang Layak
investasi, mencakup
penciptaan lapangan kerja,
upaya dalam mengurangi
kemiskinan dan pertumbuhan
ekonomi.
(TKBI Versi 3, hal. 863)
Berdasarkan penjelasan diatas, aktivitas usaha PLTM Madong memenuhi persyaratan TKBI (Taxonomy-Aligned) klasifikasi HIJAU.
4. PLTM Ordi Hulu
Aspek Penilaian Kriteria Hijau Penjelasan Hasil
Penilaian
Klasifikasi Aktivitas: - PT Sumatera Energi Lestari (SEL) telah mendapatkan Izin Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik TBKI-
(IUPTL) melalui sistem OSS dengan nomor izin 34/IUPTL/OSS/2019. Berdasarkan Nomor Induk Eligible
KBLI 35101 (2017) / Berusaha (NIB) 9120305103607, perusahaan ini merupakan pengelola dan operator dari
KBLI 35111 (2020) / Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Minihidro (PLTM) Ordi Hulu dengan kapasitas terpasang 2x5 MW (10
KBLI 35120 (2025) MW). Proyek ini dibangun untuk mendukung penyediaan kebutuhan tenaga listrik di Kabupaten
Pakpak Bharat, Provinsi Sumatera Utara, tepatnya berlokasi di Desa Pardomuan, Kecamatan
Sitellu Tali Urang Julu.
Aktivitas PLTM Ordi Hulu terkategori kedalam KBLI 35101 (2017) / yaitu Pembangkitan Tenaga
Listrik atau KBLI 35120 (2025), yaitu Pembangkitan Tenaga Listrik dari Sumber Energi
Terbarukan. KBLI ini mencakup kelompok yang mencakup usaha memproduksi tenaga Listrik
melalui pembangkitan tenaga Listrik yang menggunakan berbagai jenis sumber energi,
termasuk sumber energi aliran dan terjunan air.
Environmental Kategori EO1 sumber energi tenaga 1. PLTM Ordi Hulu memiliki Izin Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (IUPTL) Nomor Hijau
Objective (EO): air: 9120305103607 yang ditetapkan tanggal 1 Oktober 2019.
2. Berdasarkan hasil tinjauan terhadap Dokumen Izin Pengusahaan Sumber Daya Air,
meskipun istilah Run-of-River (ROR) tidak disebutkan secara eksplisit, terdapat indikasi
18
Page 45
EO1: Climate 1) Izin Berusaha di Bidang yang kuat bahwa PLTM Ordi Hulu menerapkan skema Run-of-River, yang didukung oleh
Change Mitigation Ketenagalistrikan (IUPTLU bukti-bukti sebagai berikut:
dan/atau IUPTLS) • Jenis konstruksi yang digunakan meliputi bendung (weir) dan intake. Konfigurasi ini
2) Menggunakan run-off-river; atau sesuai dengan prinsip kerja pembangkit Run-of-River, yaitu mengalihkan sebagian debit
menggunakan waduk dengan sungai ke saluran pembawa (waterway) melalui peninggian muka air menggunakan
power density >4W/m2; atau
bendung, tanpa membendung dan menampung air dalam jumlah besar hingga
Lifecycle emissions dari seluruh
fasilitas pembangkit listrik <100 membentuk waduk atau danau buatan.
gCO2e/kWh • Pemanfaatan air untuk operasi pembangkit listrik bersifat sirkulasi, di mana air yang
telah digunakan wajib dikembalikan ke sungai sebagai sumber air tanpa mengurangi
(TKBI Versi 3, hal. 102) debit alami maupun menurunkan mutu air.
Essential Criteria Memiliki PROPER minimal BIRU atau Berdasarkan penelaahan lebih mendalam terhadap Laporan Pelaksanaan Pengelolaan dan Hijau
(EC): memenuhi kriteria berikut: Pemantauan Lingkungan Semester I dan II Tahun 2025, berikut adalah rincian penilaian
1) Persetujuan Lingkungan dapat Environmental Objective 3 (EO3) terkait perlindungan ekosistem dan keanekaragaman hayati
DNSH (Do Not berupa dokumen untuk PLTM Ordi Hulu:
Significant Harm) AMDAL/UKL/UPL/SPPL. 1) Kepemilikan Persetujuan Lingkungan (EIA/ESIA)
2) Aktivitas perlu mengelola risiko PLTM Ordi Hulu telah memiliki dokumen Izin Lingkungan dari Pemerintah Kabupaten Pakpak
yang berpotensi menurunkan Bharat dengan Nomor 503/90/1215.210/VI/2022. Hal ini memenuhi syarat dasar TSC poin 1
kualitas air dan mengganggu mengenai kepemilikan persetujuan lingkungan.
kuantitas air dengan melakukan
konsumsi air pada tingkat yang 2) Pengelolaan Risiko Kualitas dan Kuantitas Air
wajar serta memiliki rencana Data Semester I 2025: Hasil uji menunjukkan parameter utama berada di bawah ambang batas
penggunaan air dan pengelolaan (BML 50 mg/L untuk TSS; 6-9 untuk pH). Nilai TSS tercatat 26,10 mg/L (outlet) dan 22,40 mg/L
konservasi sesuai dengan (inlet), sementara pH berada di kisaran 7,20 (outlet) dan 6,85 (inlet).
ketentuan yang berlaku. Data Semester II 2025: Konsistensi kualitas air tetap terjaga dengan TSS sebesar 27,00 mg/L
(outlet) dan 30,00 mg/L (inlet) serta pH di kisaran 7,10 - 7,38.
(TKBI Versi 3, hal.743) Pengusahaan sumber daya air telah mengantongi izin dari Menteri PUPR (No. 710/KPTS/M/2024)
yang mewajibkan pengembalian debit air secara sirkulasi tanpa mengurangi jumlah debit alami
sungai
Berdasarkan data dari Laporan Pelaksanaan Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan Lingkungan
Semester I dan II tahun 2025, seluruh parameter lingkungan uji air menunjukkan kepatuhan
terhadap baku mutu yang berlaku di Indonesia, didukung dengan legalitas izin lingkungan dan
izin pemanfaatan sumber daya air yang lengkap.
Essential Criteria Kebijakan / pedoman / praktik terkait: Perusahaan Induk, PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk, memiliki dokumen pendukung berupa Surat Hijau
(EC): 1) Perlindungan dan Keputusan Direksi No.57/SK-DIR/LEG-KEL/XII/2024 tentang Penetapan Kebijakan
Penghormatan HAM
19
Page 46
Aspek Sosial 2) Ketenagakerjaan mencakup Penghormatan dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Berdasarkan Standar Internasional.
pekerjaan layak, pencegahan Keputusan tersebut menyatakan bahwa:
kerja paksa, perlindungan PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk dan seluruh anak Perusahaan berkomitmen untuk memastikan
terhadap pekerja perempuan bahwa seluruh kegiatan operasional berdasarkan pada prinsip-prinsip hak asasi manusia yang
dan anak, serta pengembangan diakui secara universal, termasuk namun tidak terbatas pada:
sumber daya manusia 1. Non-diskriminasi
3) Dampak terhadap masyarakat 2. Kerja Paksa dan Pekerjaan Anak
yang tinggal dekat dengan 3. Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3)
investasi, mencakup 4. Kebebasan Berserikat dan Berunding Bersama
penciptaan lapangan kerja, 5. Upah yang Layak
upaya dalam mengurangi
kemiskinan dan pertumbuhan
ekonomi
(TKBI Versi 3, hal. 863)
Berdasarkan penjelasan diatas, aktivitas usaha PLTM Ordi Hulu memenuhi persyaratan TKBI (Taxonomy-Aligned) klasifikasi HIJAU.
5. PLTM Salu Noling
Aspek Penilaian Kriteria Hijau Penjelasan Hasil
Penilaian
Klasifikasi Aktivitas: - PT Tiara Tirta Energi telah mengantongi Izin Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (IUPTL) melalui TBKI-
sistem OSS dengan nomor izin 12130004411450003, yang diperkuat dengan Surat Direktur Eligible
KBLI 35101 (2017) / Pembinaan Pengusahaan Ketenagalistrikan Nomor B-2932/TL.04/DLB.1/2024 terkait
KBLI 35111 (2020) / Pemenuhan Komitmen IUPTLU. PT Tiara Tirta Energi merupakan pengelola dan operator dari
KBLI 35120 (2025) Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Minihidro (PLTM) Salu Noling dengan kapasitas terpasang 2x5,8 MW
(11,6 MW) dan kontrak daya sebesar 10 MW.
Aktivitas PLTM Salu Noling terkategori kedalam KBLI 35101 (2017) yaitu Pembangkitan Tenaga
Listrik atau KBLI 35120 (2025), yaitu Pembangkitan Tenaga Listrik dari Sumber Energi
Terbarukan. KBLI ini mencakup kelompok yang mencakup usaha memproduksi tenaga Listrik
melalui pembangkitan tenaga Listrik yang menggunakan berbagai jenis sumber energi,
termasuk sumber energi aliran dan terjunan air.
Environmental Kategori EO1 sumber energi tenaga 1. Sesuai dengan dokumen "TTE - IUPTL PLTM Salu Noling.pdf", PT Tiara Tirta Energi sebagai Hijau
Objective (EO): air: perator PLTM Salu Noling telah mendapatkan Izin Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (IUPTL),
1) Izin Berusaha di Bidang dengan nomor izin: 12130004411450003 yang diterbitkan pada 3 September 2024. Sesuai
EO1: Climate Ketenagalistrikan (IUPTLU dengan kriteria E01, bukti pendukung IUPTL yang dilampirkan dinilai memadai.
Change Mitigation dan/atau IUPTLS)
20
Page 47
2) Menggunakan run-off-river; atau 2. Berdasarkan dokumen "TTE - UKL-UPL PLTM Salu Noling.pdf" bagian Bab II Rencana Kegiatan
menggunakan waduk dengan PLTM Salu Noling, PLTM Salu Noling direncanakan menggunakan skema Run Off River (ROR)
power density >4W/m2; atau dalam pemanfaatan air sungai Salu Noling.
Lifecycle emissions dari seluruh
fasilitas pembangkit listrik <100 3. Berdasarkan Laporan Pelaksanaan RKL-RPL (Laporan Izin Lingkungan) Semester I dan
gCO2e/kWh Semester II Tahun 2025, status proyek PLTM Salu Noling saat ini masih berada dalam tahap
konstruksi dan belum beroperasi. Berdasarkan evaluasi hingga akhir Semester II tahun 2025,
(TKBI Versi 3, hal. 102) proyek telah mencatatkan kemajuan fisik yang signifikan dibandingkan periode sebelumnya.
Berdasarkan Gambar 1.2 (Layout PLTM Salu Noling), desain pembangkit memanfaatkan aliran
Sungai Salu Noling melalui pengalihan air ke saluran penghantar dan mengembalikannya ke
sungai setelah digunakan untuk pembangkitan. Konfigurasi tersebut menunjukkan bahwa PLTM
Salu Noling dirancang dengan prinsip run-of-river.
Essential Criteria Memiliki PROPER minimal BIRU atau Berdasarkan penelaahan lebih mendalam terhadap Laporan Pelaksanaan RKL-RPL Semester I Hijau
(EC): memenuhi kriteria berikut: dan II Tahun 2025, berikut adalah rincian penilaian Environmental Objective 3 (EO3) terkait
1) Persetujuan Lingkungan dapat perlindungan ekosistem dan keanekaragaman hayati untuk PLTM Salu Noling:
DNSH (Do Not berupa dokumen
Significant Harm) AMDAL/UKL/UPL/SPPL. 1. Proyek telah memenuhi kriteria administratif DNSH dengan kepemilikan Izin Lingkungan
2) Aktivitas perlu mengelola risiko No. 010/SIL/DPMPTS/X/2017 dan rekomendasi UKL-UPL.
yang berpotensi menurunkan 2. Pengelolaan Risiko Kualitas dan Kuantitas Air
kualitas air dan mengganggu Berdasarkan Laporan Izin Lingkungan Semester I dan II Tahun 2025:
kuantitas air dengan melakukan Parameter kualitas air menunjukkan tren perbaikan yang sangat signifikan dari Semester 1 ke
konsumsi air pada tingkat yang Semester 2:
wajar serta memiliki rencana • Total Suspended Solids (TSS): Pada pemantauan Januari 2025 (Semester 1), kadar TSS
penggunaan air dan pengelolaan tercatat sebesar 52 mg/L, yang mana melampaui baku mutu air Kelas II (50 mg/L) akibat
konservasi sesuai dengan aktivitas penggalian. Namun, pada pemantauan Januari 2026 (Semester 2), nilai TSS
ketentuan yang berlaku. turun drastis menjadi 10 mg/L, sehingga kembali memenuhi standar.
• Derajat Keasaman (pH): Nilai pH pada Semester 1 sempat mencapai 9,9 (bersifat basa)
(TKBI Versi 3, hal.743) yang melebihi rentang baku mutu 6–9. Pada Semester 2, kondisi ini telah diperbaiki
dengan nilai pH yang kembali normal di kisaran 7,14 hingga 7,34.
• Total Dissolved Solids (TDS): Parameter TDS secara konsisten berada di bawah ambang
batas sepanjang tahun 2025, dengan nilai 130 mg/L pada Semester 1 dan turun menjadi
30 mg/L pada Semester 2.
Essential Criteria Kebijakan / pedoman / praktik terkait: Perusahaan Induk, PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk, memiliki dokumen pendukung berupa Surat Hijau
(EC): 1) Perlindungan dan Keputusan Direksi No.57/SK-DIR/LEG-KEL/XII/2024 tentang Penetapan Kebijakan
Penghormatan HAM Penghormatan dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Berdasarkan Standar Internasional.
Aspek Sosial Keputusan tersebut menyatakan bahwa:
21
Page 48
2) Ketenagakerjaan mencakup PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk dan seluruh anak Perusahaan berkomitmen untuk memastikan
pekerjaan layak, pencegahan bahwa seluruh kegiatan operasional berdasarkan pada prinsip-prinsip hak asasi manusia yang
kerja paksa, perlindungan diakui secara universal, termasuk namun tidak terbatas pada:
terhadap pekerja perempuan 1. Non-diskriminasi
dan anak, serta pengembangan 2. Kerja Paksa dan Pekerjaan Anak
sumber daya manusia 3. Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3)
3) Dampak terhadap masyarakat 4. Kebebasan Berserikat dan Berunding Bersama
yang tinggal dekat dengan 5. Upah yang Layak
investasi, mencakup
penciptaan lapangan kerja,
upaya dalam mengurangi
kemiskinan dan pertumbuhan
ekonomi.
(TKBI Versi 3, hal. 863)
Berdasarkan penjelasan diatas, aktivitas usaha PLTM Salu Noling memenuhi persyaratan TKBI (Taxonomy-Aligned) klasifikasi HIJAU.
22
Names mentioned 55 people and organisations named in the text · linked when the evidence is strong
unresolved
org
PT Energi Sakti Sentosa
p.3 ×2
unresolved
org
PT Nagata Dinamika Hidro Madong
p.3 ×5
unresolved
org
PT Sumatra Energi Lestari
p.3 ×2
unresolved
org
PT Tiara Tirta Energi
p.3 ×10
unresolved
org
PT Superintending
p.3 ×2
unresolved
org
PT SUCOFINDO
p.4 ×6
unresolved
org
PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk's
p.4 ×2
unresolved
org
PT PLN (Persero)
p.4 ×2
unresolved
org
Indonesia Stock Exchange
p.4
unresolved
org
PT Energy Sakti Sentosa
p.7 ×5
unresolved
org
PT Nagata Dinamika
p.7 ×2
unresolved
org
PT Sumatra Energi
p.7
unresolved
org
PT Energi Sakti
p.8 ×4
unresolved
org
PT Bangun Tirta
p.8 ×6
unresolved
org
PT Nagata
p.8 ×9
unresolved
org
PT Sumter
p.8
unresolved
org
PT Tirta Tiara
p.8 ×2
unresolved
org
PT Energy Sakti
p.8 ×4
unresolved
org
PT Tiara Tirta
p.9 ×6
unresolved
org
PT Sumatra
p.9 ×2
unresolved
org
PT Nagata Madong
p.9
unresolved
org
PT ESS
p.9 ×9
unresolved
org
PT BTL
p.9 ×10
unresolved
org
PT TTE
p.9 ×2
unresolved
org
PT SEL
p.9 ×2
unresolved
org
Kencana Energi Lesteri Tbk
p.10 ×4
unresolved
org
PT Bangun Water
p.11
unresolved
org
PT Sumatra PLTM Ordi
p.11
unresolved
org
PT SUCOFINDO. Meanwhile
p.12
unresolved
org
PT Kencana Energi Lestari Sustainability
p.13
unresolved
org
PT ESS EO
p.14
unresolved
org
PT Energy Sakti Sentosa Environmental Permit
p.14
unresolved
org
Ministry of Environment
p.15
unresolved
org
PT NDHM
p.18 ×3
unresolved
org
PT NDMH
p.19 ×2
unresolved
org
Minister of PUPR
p.21
unresolved
org
PT Sumatera Energi Lestari
p.27 ×2
unresolved
org
PT Sumatera Energi
p.31
unresolved
org
PT Sumater Energi
p.32
unresolved
org
PT Sumatera
p.33 ×3
unresolved
org
PT Bangun
p.35
unresolved
org
PT SUCOFINDO. Sedangkan
p.36
unresolved
org
PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tahun
p.37 ×2
unresolved
org
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup
p.39
unresolved
org
Pemerintah Kabupaten Pakpak
p.45
unresolved
org
Menteri PUPR
p.45
unresolved
person
Eligible
· Direktur
p.46
Extraction attempts how the parser did, and what it refused
Nothing structured was extracted from this document — the attempts below say why.
No extraction attempted yet.